Performative Force, Convention, and Discursive Injustice

Hypatia 29 (2):440-457 (2014)
I explore how gender can shape the pragmatics of speech. In some circumstances, when a woman deploys standard discursive conventions in order to produce a speech act with a specific performative force, her utterance can turn out, in virtue of its uptake, to have a quite different force—a less empowering force—than it would have if performed by a man. When members of a disadvantaged group face a systematic inability to produce a specific kind of speech act that they are entitled to perform—and in particular when their attempts result in their actually producing a different kind of speech act that further compromises their social position and agency—then they are victims of what I call discursive injustice. I examine three examples of discursive injustice. I contrast my account with Langton and Hornsby's account of illocutionary silencing. I argue that lack of complete control over the performative force of our speech acts is universal, and not a special marker of social disadvantage. However, women and other relatively disempowered speakers are sometimes subject to a distinctive distortion of the path from speaking to uptake, which undercuts their social agency in ways that track and enhance existing social disadvantages.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2012.01316.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,370
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts.Rae Langton - 1993 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (4):293-330.
On the Name.Jacques Derrida - 1995 - Stanford University Press.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Slurs, Roles and Power.Mihaela Popa-Wyatt & Jeremy L. Wyatt - 2017 - Philosophical Studies:1-28.
Sincerity Silencing.Mary Kate Mcgowan - 2014 - Hypatia 29 (2):458-473.
Ingrouping, Outgrouping, and the Pragmatics of Peripheral Speech.Cassie Herbert & Rebecca Kukla - 2016 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2 (4):576-596.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Linguistic Authority and Convention in a Speech Act Analysis of Pornography.Nellie Wieland - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):435 – 456.
Illocution, Silencing and the Act of Refusal.Mari Mikkola - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (3):415-437.
I. A Comment on Performative, Subject, and Proposition in Habermas's Theory of Communication.Erling Skjei - 1985 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):87 – 105.
Hate Speech and the Problems of Agency.Kory Schaff - 2000 - Social Philosophy Today 16:185-201.
Content, Mood, and Force.François Recanati - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (7):622-632.
Negative Acts.Stefanov Gheorghe - 2010 - Analele Universitatii Bucuresti - Filosofie (LIX):3-9.
Failing to Do Things with Words.Nicole Wyatt - 2009 - Southwest Philosophy Review 25 (1):135-142.
A Linguistic Model of Informed Consent.Jan Marta - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (1):41-60.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
122 ( #41,254 of 2,193,775 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #13,281 of 2,193,775 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature