Perspectives on Science 28 (1):63-88 (2020)

Authors
Moti Mizrahi
Florida Institute of Technology
Abstract
There is an ongoing methodological debate in philosophy of science concerning the use of case studies as evidence for and/or against theories about science. In this paper, I aim to make a contribution to this debate by taking an empirical approach. I present the results of a systematic survey of the PhilSci-Archive, which suggest that a sizeable proportion of papers in philosophy of science contain appeals to case studies, as indicated by the occurrence of the indicator words “case study” and/or “case studies.” These results are confirmed by data mined from the JSTOR database on research articles published in leading journals in the field: Philosophy of Science, the British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (BJPS), and the Journal for General Philosophy of Science (JGPS), as well as the Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (PSA). The data also show upward trends in appeals to case studies in articles published in Philosophy of Science, the BJPS, and the JGPS. The empirical work I have done for this paper provides philosophers of science who are wary of the use of case studies as evidence for and/or against theories about science with a way to do philosophy of science that is informed by data rather than case studies.
Keywords case study  data science  empirical philosophy of science  metaphilosophy  philosophical methodology  scientific philosophy of science
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1162/posc_a_00333
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Logical Self-Defense.Ralph Henry Johnson & J. Anthony Blair - 1977 - Toronto, Canada: Mcgraw-Hill.

View all 46 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Hypothesis Testing in Scientific Practice: An Empirical Study.Moti Mizrahi - 2020 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 33 (1):1-21.
Emergence of Scientific Understanding in Real-Time Ecological Research Practice.Luana Poliseli - 2020 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 42 (4):1-25.
Proof, Explanation, and Justification in Mathematical Practice.Moti Mizrahi - 2020 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 51 (4):551-568.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

An Empirical Method for the Study of Exemplar Explanations.Mads Goddiksen - 2014 - In Hanne Andersen, Nancy J. Nersessian & Susann Wagenknecht (eds.), Empirical Philosophy of Science. Springer Verlag.
Philosophy of Science and History of Science: A Troubling Interaction.Cassandra Pinnick & George Gale - 2000 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 31 (1):109-125.
Reconstructed Science as Philosophical Evidence.Nancy L. Maull - 1976 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:119-129.
Vom Nutzen der Historie für die Wissenschaftsphilosophie.Jutta Schickore - 2013 - Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 36 (1):83-93.
The Relevance of History to Philosophy of Science.Robert G. Hudson - 2006 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 21 (2):197-212.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-11-30

Total views
428 ( #22,652 of 2,507,562 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
96 ( #7,766 of 2,507,562 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes