Beyond divorce: Current status of the discovery debate

Philosophy of Science 52 (2):177-206 (1985)
Does the viability of the discovery program depend on showing either (1) that methods of generating new problem solutions, per se, have special probative weight (the per se thesis); or, (2) that the original conception of an idea is logically continuous with its justification (anti-divorce thesis)? Many writers have identified these as the key issues of the discovery debate. McLaughlin, Pera, and others recently have defended the discovery program by attacking the divorce thesis, while Laudan has attacked the discovery program by rejecting the per se thesis. This disagreement over the central issue has led to communication breakdown. I contend that both friends and foes of discovery mistake the central issues. Recognizing a form of divorce helps rather than hurts the discovery program. However, the per se thesis is not essential to the program (nor is the related debate over novel prediction); hence, the status of the per se thesis is a side issue. With these clarifications in hand, we can proceed to the next stage of the discovery debate--the development (or revival) of a generative conception of justification which goes beyond consequentialism to forge a strong linkage of generation (or rather, generatability) with justification
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289239
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,308
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
More Thoughts on HPS: Another 20 Years Later.Jutta Schickore - 2011 - Perspectives on Science 19 (4):453-481.
Discovery as Correction.James Blachowicz - 1987 - Synthese 71 (3):235 - 321.
The Economics of Science.Arthur M. Diamond - 1996 - Knowledge and Policy 9 (2-3):6-49.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Is It Justifiable to Abandon All Search for a Logic of Discovery?Mehul Shah - 2007 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (3):253 – 269.
Discovery and its Logic: Popper and the "Friends of Discovery".Claude Savary - 1995 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (3):318-344.
Conventionalism, Scientific Discovery and the Sociology of Knowledge.Angelo M. Petroni - 1993 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7 (3):225 – 240.
The Logics of Discovery in Popper's Evolutionary Epistemology.Mehul Shah - 2008 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 39 (2):303 - 319.
Automated Discovery Systems and Scientific Realism.Piotr Giza - 2002 - Minds and Machines 12 (1):105-117.
Discovery and Ampliative Inference.James Blachowicz - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (3):438-462.
Discovery and Justification.Carl R. Kordig - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (1):110-117.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
29 ( #179,851 of 2,180,176 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #156,395 of 2,180,176 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums