Psychological Reactance to Leader Moral Hypocrisy

Business Ethics Quarterly:1-28 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Drawing on early work on ethical leadership, we argue that when leaders engage in leader moral hypocrisy (i.e., ethical promotion without ethical demonstration), followers can experience psychological reactance—a negative response to a perceived restriction of freedom—which can have negative downstream consequences. In a survey of employee–manager dyads (study 1), we demonstrate that leader moral hypocrisy is positively associated with follower psychological reactance, which increases follower deviance. In two subsequent laboratory experiments, we find similar patterns of results (study 2) and explore potential alternative mechanisms (study 3). We demonstrate in a final experiment with working adults that the relationship between leader moral hypocrisy and psychological reactance is partly explained by increased perceptions of a leader’s use of power (study 4). We discuss the implications of our findings and advocate for further understanding of the risks associated with psychological reactance in response to leaders and other workplace situations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Freedom and reactance.Robert A. Wicklund - 1974 - Potomac, Md.,: L. Erlbaum Associates; distributed by the Halsted Press Division, Wiley.
Internalized Moral Identity in Ethical Leadership.Rebekka Skubinn & Lisa Herzog - 2016 - Journal of Business Ethics 133 (2):249-260.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-11-29

Downloads
15 (#938,320)

6 months
15 (#162,849)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Isaac Smith
Universität Tübingen

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations