Genetic links, family ties, and social bonds: Rights and responsibilities in the face of genetic knowledge
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (1):10 – 30 (1998)
Currently, some of the most significant moral issues involving genetic links relate to genetic knowledge. In this paper, instead of looking at the frequently addressed issues of responsibilities professionals or institutions have to individuals, I take up the question of what responsibilities individuals have to one another with respect to genetic knowledge. I address the questions of whether individuals have a moral right to pursue their own goals without contributing to society's knowledge of population genetics, without adding to their family's knowledge of its genetic history, and without discovering genetic information about themselves and their offspring. These questions lead to an examination of the presumed right to genetic ignorance and an exploration of a variety of social bonds. Analyzing cases in light of these considerations leads to a surprising conclusion about a widely accepted precept of genetic counseling, to some ethical insights into typical problems, and to some further unanswered questions about personal responsibility in the face of genetic knowledge.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Looking for Trouble: Preventive Genomic Sequencing in the General Population and the Role of Patient Choice.Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz, John M. Conley, Arlene M. Davis, Marcia Van Riper, Rebecca L. Walker & Eric T. Juengst - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (7):3-14.
To Know or Not to Know? Genetic Ignorance, Autonomy and Paternalism.Jane Wilson - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (5-6):492-504.
Different Concepts and Models of Information for Family-Relevant Genetic Findings: Comparison and Ethical Analysis.Christian Lenk & Debora Frommeld - 2015 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (3):393-408.
“Please Don't Tell Me”.Jonathan Herring & Charles Foster - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (01):20-29.
Similar books and articles
The Changing Face of "Misidentified Paternity".Dena S. Davis - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (4):359 – 373.
Are Genetic Self-Tests Dangerous? Assessing the Commercialization of Genetic Testing in Terms of Personal Autonomy.Ludvig Beckman - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (5-6):387-398.
Genetic Information: Important but Not “Exceptional”. [REVIEW]Ruth Hannah Wilkinson - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (3):457-472.
The Social Construction of Genetic Abnormality: Ethical Implications for Managerial Decisions in the Workplace. [REVIEW]Alan Strudler - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (11):839 - 848.
Genetic Prediction: What Are the Limits?M. O. - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (4):619-633.
Individual, Family, and Societal Dimensions of Genetic Discrimination: A Case Study Analysis. [REVIEW]Lisa N. Geller, Joseph S. Alper, Paul R. Billings, Carol I. Barash, Jonathan Beckwith & Marvin R. Natowicz - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (1):71-88.
Exploring the Public Understanding of Basic Genetic Concepts.Sharon L. R. Kardia, Jane P. Sheldon, Elizabeth M. Petty, Merle Feldbaum, Elizabeth S. Anderson, Angela D. Lanie & Toby Epstein Jayaratne - unknown
Human Genes and Neoliberal Governance: A Foucauldian Critique.Antoinette Rouvroy - 2008 - Routledge-Cavendish.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads49 ( #107,843 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #113,123 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?