Difficulties for the Reconciling and Estranging Projects: Some Symmetries

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):240-244 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Suppose that Susan did not go to the movies. The reconciling project attempts to show that this plus Determinism does not imply that Susan could not have gone to the movies. The estranging project attempts to show the opposite. A counter‐entailment argument is of the form A is consistent with C, and C entails not‐B, therefore A does not entail B. An instance of the counter‐entailment arguments undermines a central argument for the reconciling project. Another instance undermines a central argument for the estranging project. This is one symmetry. In each case, the natural response to the counter‐entailment argument begs the question. This is another symmetry.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A priori entailment and conceptual analysis: Making room for type-c physicalism.J. L. Dowell - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (1):93 – 111.
Does Value Pluralism Entail Liberalism?Robert Talisse - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (3):303-320.
Out of Nothing.Daniele Sgaravatti & Giuseppe Spolaore - 2018 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy (2):132-138.
Russell's "Refutation" of Meinong in "On Denoting".Ronald Suter - 1967 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 27 (4):512-516.
Spinoza’s Temporal Argument for Actualism.Harold Zellner - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:303-309.
Spinoza’s Temporal Argument for Actualism.Harold Zellner - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:303-309.
Suter on Russell on meinong.Jerome-I. Gellman - 1969 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 29:441-445.
C. S. Lewis' Argument from Nostalgia: A New Argument from Desire.Todd Buras & Michael Cantrell - 2018 - In Jerry L. Walls Trent Dougherty (ed.), Two Dozen (or so) Arguments for God: The Plantinga Project. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 356-371.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
17 (#213,731)

6 months
2 (#1,816,284)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Sanford
Duke University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references