Normative Concepts: A Connectedness Model

Philosophers' Imprint 14 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper proposes a new relational account of concepts and shows how it is particularly well suited to characterizing normative concepts. The key advantage of our ‘connectedness’ model is that it explains how subjects can share the same normative concepts despite radical divergences in the descriptive or motivational commitments they associate with them. The connectedness model builds social and historical facts into the foundations of concept identity. This aspect of the model, we suggest, reshapes normative epistemology and provides new resources for a vindication of realism in ethics

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-07-18

Downloads
357 (#6,705)

6 months
28 (#553,444)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Laura Schroeter
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

Which Concepts Should We Use?: Metalinguistic Negotiations and The Methodology of Philosophy.David Plunkett - 2015 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 58 (7-8):828-874.
A Guided Tour Of Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics.Herman Cappelen & David Plunkett - 2019 - In Alexis Burgess, Herman Cappelen & David Plunkett (eds.), Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics. New York, USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 1-26.
Moral supervenience.Anandi Hattiangadi - 2018 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 48 (3-4):592-615.
Shared modes of presentation.Simon Prosser - 2018 - Mind and Language 34 (4):465-482.
The Publicity of Thought.Andrea Onofri - 2018 - Philosophical Quarterly 68 (272).

View all 41 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references