An update on the “empirical turn” in bioethics: analysis of empirical research in nine bioethics journals

BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):6 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A review of literature published a decade ago noted a significant increase in empirical papers across nine bioethics journals. This study provides an update on the presence of empirical papers in the same nine journals. It first evaluates whether the empirical trend is continuing as noted in the previous study, and second, how it is changing, that is, what are the characteristics of the empirical works published in these nine bioethics journals. A review of the same nine journals was conducted for a 12-year period from 2004 to 2015. Data obtained was analysed descriptively and using a non-parametric Chi-square test. Of the total number of original papers published in the nine bioethics journals, 18.1% collected and analysed empirical data. Journal of Medical Ethics and Nursing Ethics led the empirical publications, accounting for 89.4% of all empirical papers. The former published significantly more quantitative papers than qualitative, whereas the latter published more qualitative papers. Our analysis reveals no significant difference between the proportion of empirical papers published in 2004–2009 and 2010–2015. However, the increasing empirical trend has continued in these journals with the proportion of empirical papers increasing from 14.9% in 2004 to 17.8% in 2015. This study presents the current state of affairs regarding empirical research published nine bioethics journals. In the quarter century of data that is available about the nine bioethics journals studied in two reviews, the proportion of empirical publications continues to increase, signifying a trend towards empirical research in bioethics. The growing volume is mainly attributable to two journals: Journal of Medical Ethics and Nursing Ethics. This descriptive study further maps the still developing field of empirical research in bioethics. Additional studies are needed to completely map the nature and extent of empirical research in bioethics to inform the ongoing debate about the value of empirical research for bioethics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,310

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Empirical Research in Bioethical Journals. A Quantitative Analysis.P. Borry - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (4):240-245.
Authorship Policies of Bioethics Journals.D. B. Resnik & Z. Master - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (7):424-428.
Why Health Services Research Needs Bioethics.Lucy Frith - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (10):655-656.
What ‘Empirical Turn in Bioethics’?Samia Hurst - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (8):439-444.
The Role of Empirical Research in Bioethics.Alexander A. Kon - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):59-65.
The Relation Between Normative and Descriptive Ethics – A Consideration of Empirical Bioethics.Jon Hugaas - 2009 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 19 (1):21-26.
An Overview of Empirical Ethics Research in Turkish Medical Ethics Literature.Funda Kadıoğlu & Selim Kadıoğlu - 2011 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 21 (6):197-199.
Systematic Reviews of Empirical Bioethics.D. Strech, M. Synofzik & G. Marckmann - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (6):472-477.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-08

Downloads
16 (#662,230)

6 months
1 (#415,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Veerle Provoost
University of Ghent