Naturalized Phenomenology: A Desideratum or a Category Mistake?

Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 72:23-42 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If we want to assess whether or not a naturalized phenomenology is a desideratum or a category mistake, we need to be clear on precisely what notion of phenomenology and what notion of naturalization we have in mind. In the article I distinguish various notions, and after criticizing one type of naturalized phenomenology, I sketch two alternative takes on what a naturalized phenomenology might amount to and propose that our appraisal of the desirability of such naturalization should be more positive, if we opt for one or both of the latter alternatives.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Eidetic results in transcendental phenomenology: Against naturalization.Richard Tieszen - 2016 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15 (4):489-515.
Beyond reflection in naturalized phenomenology.Glenn Braddock - 2001 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (11):3-16.
Nature’s Dark Domain: An Argument for a Naturalized Phenomenology.David Roden - 2013 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 72:169-88.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-19

Downloads
152 (#124,440)

6 months
26 (#140,341)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dan Zahavi
University of Copenhagen