ArgumentThe purpose of this volume is to investigate a number of selected examples of contact zones between the sciences and literature. We will be dealing with prominent cases of how science and literature encounter and interact with each other and profit by this recourse to their corresponding other, yielding aspects of self-reflection and self-representation. The volume will not attempt to address the question whether the so-called “two cultures” can be brought closer together or superseded by a third. We will be (...) dealing neither with science and literature in an autobiographical or “life-world” sense, nor with popular scientific texts with quasi-literary claims, such as Stephen Hawking's theory of time, nor, in the parallel universe of popular fiction, with science fiction. (shrink)

The ArgumentMy thesis in this text is that A. Ernst Cassirer outlines a philosophical theory that proves equally sensitive to historical change and to the consistency of conceptual thinking. B. Cassirer relies on the differential logic of an internally ruptured, and yet undivided “basis phenomenon.” Especially his reading of Goethe has led to the concept of the basis phenomenon existing in a differential symbolic mode. Cassirer's delineation of Goethe's conceptual trivium ofUrphänomene— “experience,” “deed,” and “life” — underscores the conceptual rupture (...) in the construction of any basis phenomenon. Furthermore, I argue that C. thePhilosophy of Symbolic Forms, takes up Goethe's notion of basis phenomena and eventually turns it into a modern, pluralistic theorem about the interrelation of science and culture. Cassirer reaches this aim by (1) focusing on the question of philosophical inquiry as a basis phenomenon in the sense of a basic philosophical activity. I also argue that (2) Cassirer's view retains an essentially ambiguous character, as opposed to a fundamentalist notion of basis phenomena. It is important to see that (3) this ambiguity also informs Cassirer's notion of culture (the plurality of symbolic forms), as well as his delienation of the relation between culture and science. (shrink)

Der Philosoph Ernst Cassirer liest Goethe als einen Autor von philosophischer Dignität. Er bringt Goethes Texte auf eine individuelle Weise erneut zum Sprechen, indem er sie im Licht seiner eigenen Theorie liest und an ihnen exemplarisch werden läßt, wie eine symboltheoretisch begründete Kulturphilosophie im umfassenden Sinne zu verstehen sei. Die Aufsätze des Bandes betreten wissenschaftliches Neuland in zwei Richtungen: Indem sie nach der philosophischen Rezeption eines Dichters im Werk des Theoretikers fragen, dem wir die elaborierteste Kulturphilosophie des 20. Jahrhunderts verdanken, (...) präsentieren sie zugleich eine Facette des Wirkens Goethescher Dichtung und Theoriebildung in der zeitgenössischen Philosophie, die bisher in der Forschung wenig Beachtung gefunden hat. Hier wird ein Themenbereich angesprochen, der durch die universale Gelehrsamkeit Goethes wie Cassirers aus sich selbst heraus und par excellence die Notwendigkeit des interdisziplinären Zusammenspiels der Fächer erkennen läßt. (shrink)