Order:
Disambiguations
Debra R. Comer [10]David J. Comer [2]David Comer [1]D. Comer [1]
  1.  9
    Positive Organizational Ethics: Cultivating and Sustaining Moral Performance. [REVIEW]Leslie E. Sekerka, Debra R. Comer & Lindsey N. Godwin - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 119 (4):1-10.
    We present this special issue on positive organizational ethics (POE) to highlight those pursuing positive subjective experiences, positive attributes of individuals and groups, and positive practices that contribute to ethical and virtuous behavior in organizations. Although prior research has offered some insight in this area, there is still much to be learned about how to cultivate and sustain ethical strength in different types of organizations and how goodness can emerge from and in spite of human failings. After describing the positive (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  2.  65
    Sticks and Stones May Break Your Bones, but Words Can Break Your Spirit: Bullying in the Workplace.Gina Vega & Debra R. Comer - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 58 (1-3):101-109.
    Workplace bullying has a well-established body of research internationally, but the United States has lagged behind the rest of the world in the identification and investigation of this phenomenon. This paper presents a managerial perspective on bullying in organizations. The lack of attention to the concept of workplace dignity in American organizational structures has supported and even encouraged both casual and more severe forms of harassment that our workplace laws do not currently cover. The demoralization victims suffer can create toxic (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  3.  32
    Using the PET Assessment Instrument to Help Students Identify Factors That Could Impede Moral Behavior.Debra R. Comer & Gina Vega - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 77 (2):129 - 145.
    We present an instrument developed to explain to students the concept of the personal ethical threshold (PET). The PET represents an individual’s susceptibility to situational pressure in his or her organization that makes moral behavior more personally difficult. Further, the PET varies according to the moral intensity of the issue at hand, such that individuals are less vulnerable to situational pressure for issues of high moral intensity, i.e., those with greater consequences for others. A higher PET reflects an individual’s greater (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  4.  8
    Using the PET Assessment Instrument to Help Students Identify Factors That Could Impede Moral Behavior.Debra R. Comer & Gina Vega - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 77 (2):129-145.
    We present an instrument developed to explain to students the concept of the personal ethical threshold. The PET represents an individual's susceptibility to situational pressure in his or her organization that makes moral behavior more personally difficult. Further, the PET varies according to the moral intensity of the issue at hand, such that individuals are less vulnerable to situational pressure for issues of high moral intensity, i.e., those with greater consequences for others. A higher PET reflects an individual's greater likelihood (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  5.  41
    The Problem of Humiliation in Peer Review.Debra R. Comer & Michael Schwartz - 2014 - Ethics and Education 9 (2):141-156.
    This paper examines the problem of vituperative feedback from peer reviewers. We argue that such feedback is morally unacceptable, insofar as it humiliates authors and damages their dignity. We draw from social-psychological research to explore those aspects of the peer-review process in general and the anonymity of blind reviewing in particular that contribute to reviewers’ humiliating comments. We then apply Iris Murdoch's ideas about a virtuous consciousness and humility to make the case that peer referees have a moral obligation not (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  6.  26
    Highlighting Moral Courage in the Business Ethics Course.Debra R. Comer & Michael Schwartz - 2017 - Journal of Business Ethics 146 (3):703-723.
    At the end of their article in the September 2014 issue of the Journal of Business Ethics, Douglas R. May, Matthew T. Luth, and Catherine E. Schwoerer state that they are “hopeful in outlook” about the “evidence that business ethics instructors are….able to encourage students…to develop the courage to come forward even when pressures in organizations dictate otherwise”. We agree with May et al. that it is essential to augment students’ moral courage. However, it seems overly optimistic to believe that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  18
    Comparative Victimisation and Victimhood During the Second World War: Claims of Moral Equivalence.Michael Schwartz & Debra R. Comer - 2018 - Journal of Military Ethics 17 (2-3):92-107.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  35
    An Experiential Exercise That Introduces the Concept of the Personal Ethical Threshold to Develop Moral Courage.Debra R. Comer & Gina Vega - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 2 (2):171-197.
    This paper presents an experiential exercise introducing the concept of the personal ethical threshold to help explain why moral behavior does not always follow moral intention. An individual’s PET represents the individual’s vulnerability to situational factors, i.e., how little or much it takes for members of organizations to cross their proverbial line to act in a way they deem unethical. The PET reflects the interplay among the situation, the particular ethical issue, and the individual. Exploring the PET can help account (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  9.  13
    Adapting the Jewish Spiritual Practice of Mussar to Develop Business Students’ Character.Debra R. Comer & Michael Schwartz - 2017 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 36 (2):177-196.
    Business ethics educators have been encouraged to cultivate students’ character, but have received meager instructions for doing so. Additionally, there has been insufficient focus on equipping students with the tools they need to foster their ethical development after completing our courses. In this paper, it is argued that the Jewish spiritual practice of Mussar, whose premise is that individuals can become better versions of themselves by repairing their character traits, can inform business ethics instruction. After presenting the tenets and historical (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  10
    Why Moral Philosophy Cannot Explain Oskar Schindler but Keneally's Novel Can.M. Schwartz & D. Comer - unknown
    Neither moral philosophy nor history provides a satisfactory explanation for Oskar Schindler's extraordinary rescue of more than 1,200 Jews during the Holocaust. Thomas Keneally's Schindler's Ark does. Although Schindler's Ark is technically a work of fiction, that generic label obscures its contribution as a fictionalised account of true events. By using a novelist's tools to tell an historical story, Keneally allows us to make inferences as to the motives of his protagonist and thereby helps us to understand what propelled the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  6
    De Beers, Anglo American andOptimaMagazine.Michael Schwartz & Debra R. Comer - 2015 - Business and Society Review 120 (3):329-361.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark