During the COVID-19 pandemic, many religious college students have found comfort in God, while others may have developed anger toward God; however, no studies have systematically compared the multidimensional effects of religiousness on how Muslim and Christian students react to stressors such as COVID-19. This study addressed this gap in the literature by investigating which of the Four Basic Dimensions of Religiousness Scale were significant predictors for both taking comfort in and feeling anger toward God among Muslim and Christian college (...) students in Indonesia, while also controlling for the influence of neuroticism, a known predictor for attitudes toward God. Muslims reported that all dimensions of the 4-BDRS were significant predictors of comfort, with bonding as a negative predictor, while Christians reported that belonging was the only insignificant predictor. Muslims reported that believing and behaving were negative predictors of anger, while Christians reported negative effects only for bonding ; however, bonding did not significantly predict anger when analyzed separately for men and women. Therefore, to decrease their anger toward and increase the comfort they find in God, Muslims must focus on their beliefs and exercise the commandments of Islam. Christians, though, must focus on increasing cognitive, affective, and behavioral aspects of religiousness to find comfort, while having better personal relationships with God could be key in reducing anger toward God. (shrink)

1. Zakaj začeti z moralo? -- 2. Tisoč zdravic in jutro potem -- 3. Zakaj sem liberalec in zakaj je to tak drek -- 4. Zdravstvene ustanove kot relikt socialistične (ne)odgovornosti -- 5. Kako brez kitajščine razumem Kitajce -- 6. Kako zapreti rudnik urana in postati neviden -- 7. Povest o dobrih ljudeh -- 8. Kralj na Betajnovi ali izvirni zločin oblasti -- 9. Slovenska izgorelost -- 10. Intelektualci -- 11. In na koncu, nam ostane telo.

PurposeThe COVID-19 pandemic caused a massive healthcare crisis. To investigate what makes healthcare system resilient and physicians better at coping during a crisis situation, our study investigated the role risk exposure, such as working at COVID-19 entry points, sleep, and perceived work safety played in reducing negative psychological functioning at work, as well as their effects on adverse and potentially fatal incidences of compromised safety and medical errors.MethodsOur study included a representative sample of 1,189 physicians, from all 12 Slovenian regions (...) and all medical occupations, as registered by the Medical Chamber of Slovenia. For the purposes of this study, a Questionnaire of Sleep and Psychological Functioning at Work was developed in the form of an online retrospective self-report. Additionally, our study included items assessing physicians perceived work safety and frequency of negative outcomes during the first month of the Covid-19 epidemic.ResultsPhysicians working at COVID-19 entry points were more likely to experience night awakening, slept less than 5 h per night, experience nightmares, and had lower levels of psychological functioning in comparison to other physicians. Both hypothesized models showed adequate fit. A higher score on the sleep scale has been shown to predict lower levels of negative psychological functioning at work and, indirectly, reduced incidences of compromised safety and medical errors. Contrary to our expectations, no significant direct effect of sleep on compromised safety and medical errors was found. When perceived work safety was added into the model, the model showed improved fit, with perceived work safety predicting better sleep, less negative psychological functioning at work, and less compromised safety.ConclusionSleep and safety both play an important role in reducing negative psychological functioning at work and, by doing so, decreasing the negative and potentially fatal incidents during the pandemic, such as compromised safety and medical errors. Further, research is needed to see how medical guidelines can be updated to ensure physicians sleep and that their safety is protected. (shrink)

Chrysippus claims that some propositions perish. including some true conditionals whose consequent is impossible and antecedent is possible, to which he appeals against Diodorus?s Master Argument. On the standard interpretation. perished propositions lack truth values. and these conditionals are true at the same time as their antecedents arc possible and consequents impossible. But perished propositions are false, and Chrysippus?s conditionals are true when their antecedent and consequent arc possible, and false when their antecedent is possible and consequent impossible. The claim (...) of the Master Argument that Chrysippus rejects, then, is stronger ihan usually supposed. (shrink)

1. Naemyŏnjŏk ŭro pyŏng ŭl alk'o innŭn munmyŏngsa ilmannyŏn -- 2. Yangsŏng ŭn pondi taedŭng sangbojŏk kwan'gye -- 3. Sŏng ch'abyŏl ŭi pyŏng ch'iyu nŭn ŏttŏk'e? -- 4. Chagakto e ŭihan kyohwa yobŏpchŏk sŏng p'yŏngdŭng ŭisik kaehyŏk undong -- 5. Chagakto : sunsu Chagakto -- 6. Sunsu ŭi segye, uwŏrham (ttwiŏnam) i hyŏngsŏng toenŭn segye -- 7. Kungmin Chagagwŏn mandŭlgi mit iltae kŏjokchŏk in Chagakto munhwa kyoyuk undong chŏn'gae -- 8. Sangjogye.