David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (1):43-59 (2013)
Incest is a crime in most societies. In the United States, incest is punishable in almost every state with sentences going as far as 20 and 30 years in prison, and even a life sentence. Yet the reasons traditionally proffered in justification of criminalization of incest—respecting religion and universal tradition; avoiding genetic abnormalities; protecting the family unit; preventing sexual abuse and sexual imposition; and precluding immorality—at a close examination, reveal their under- and over-inclusiveness, inconsistency or outright inadequacy. It appears that the true reason behind the long history of the incest laws is the feeling of repulsion and disgust this tabooed practice tends to evoke in the majority of population. However, in the absence of wrongdoing, neither a historic taboo nor the sense of repulsion and disgust legitimizes criminalization of an act
|Keywords||Incest—Vice Crime Immorality—Taboo Harm Wrongdoing|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Leon Kass (2002). Life, Liberty, and the Defense of Dignity: The Challenge for Bioethics. Encounter Books.
Michael S. Moore (1997/2010). Placing Blame: A Theory of the Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Martha C. Nussbaum (2006). Hiding From Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law. Princeton University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Stephen P. Garvey (2013). Was Ellen Wronged? Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (2):185-216.
Stuart P. Green (2013). Foreword: Symposium on Vice and the Criminal Law. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (1):3-9.
Similar books and articles
Courtney M. Cahill, Same-Sex Marriage, Slippery Slope Rhetoric, and the Politics of Disgust: A Critical Perspective on Contemporary Family Discourse and the Incest Taboo.
Jeffrey Sebo (2006). The Ethics of Incest. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (1):48-55.
Peter Hadreas (2002). Phenomenology and the Incest Taboo. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 33 (2):203-222.
Jerome Neu (1976). What is Wrong with Incest? Inquiry 19 (1-4):27 – 39.
Nancy Potter (1995). The Severed Head and Existential Dread: The Classroom as Epistemic Community and Student Survivors of Incest. Hypatia 10 (2):69 - 92.
Andrew F. March, Marriage, Sex and Future Persons in Liberal Public Justification: Is There a Right to Incest?
Vicki Kirby (2011). Quantum Anthropologies: Life at Large. Duke University Press.
Ben Spiecker & Jan Steutel (2000). A Moral-Philosophical Perspective on Paedophilia and Incest. Educational Philosophy and Theory 32 (3):283–291.
C. Farrelly (2008). The Case for Re-Thinking Incest Laws. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):e11-e11.
Patrick Bateson (1989). Does Evolutionary Biology Contribute to Ethics? Biology and Philosophy 4 (3):287-301.
Dennis J. Moberg (1997). On Employee Vice. Business Ethics Quarterly 7 (4):41-60.
Christian kerslake (2004). Rebirth Through Incest. Angelaki 9 (1):135 – 157.
M. Nobel (1978). Incest. Journal of Medical Ethics 4 (2):64-70.
S. J. Harrison (1996). Mythological Incest: Catullus 88. Classical Quarterly 46 (02):581-.
Paul Bloomfield (2008). The Harm of Immorality. Ratio 21 (3):241-259.
Added to index2012-05-22
Total downloads46 ( #40,339 of 1,139,891 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #18,395 of 1,139,891 )
How can I increase my downloads?