David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 35 (1):45-64 (1997)
Hume on the Characters of Virtue RICHARD H. DEES IN THE WORLD ACCORDING TO HUME, people are complicated creatures, with convoluted, often contradictory characters. Consider, for example, Hume's controversial assessment of Charles I: The character of this prince, as that of most men, if not of all men, was mixed .... To consider him in the most favourable light, it may be affirmed, that his dignity was free from pride, his humanity from weakness, his bravery from rashness, his temperance from austerity, his frugality from avarice .... To speak the most harshly of him, we may affirm, that many of his good qualities were attended with some latent frailty, which, though seemingly inconsiderable, was able, when seconded by the extreme malevolence of his fortune, to disappoint them of all their influence: His beneficent disposition was clouded by a manner not very gracious; his virtue was tinctured with superstition; his good sense was disfigured by a deference to persons of a capacity inferior to his own; and his moderate temper exempted him not from hasty and precipitate resolutions? This sketch shows Charles in all his complexities, with his virtues, near virtues, and contradicting virtues. I have quoted it at length because it is hard to summarize without losing the subtleties that lie within it. Hume's moral theory is based fundamentally on judgments of character, 2 so those subtleties are important to his view. The character sketches that pervade the..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
James Brian Coleman (2012). Hume and the Enthusiasm Puzzle. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 10 (2):221-235.
[author unknown] (2009). Walls and Vaults. John Wiley & Sons.
Paul Neiman (2006). Vivacity and Force as the Source of Hume's Irregular Arguments. Philo 9 (2):131-143.
Christine Swanton (2007). Can Hume Be Read as a Virtue Ethicist? Hume Studies 33 (1):91-113.
Don Garrett (2007). The First Motive to Justice: Hume's Circle Argument Squared. Hume Studies 33 (2):257-288.
Christine Swanton (2010). What Kind of Virtue Theorist is Hume? In Charles R. Pigden (ed.), Hume on Motivation and Virtue. Palgrave Macmillan.
Glen Pettigrove (2012). Meekness and 'Moral' Anger. Ethics 122 (2):341-370.
David Carr (2003). Character and Moral Choice in the Cultivation of Virtue. Philosophy 78 (2):219-232.
Philip A. Reed (2012). The Alliance of Virtue and Vanity in Hume's Moral Theory. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (4):595-614.
Catherine Villanueva Gardner (2006). Chastity and the Practice of the World In Hume's Treatise. Hume Studies 32 (2):331-345.
David Braun (1994). Structured Characters and Complex Demonstratives. Philosophical Studies 74 (2):193--219.
Yong Huang (2010). The Self-Centeredness Objection to Virtue Ethics. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (4):651-692.
Hektor K. T. Yan (2009). A Paradox of Virtue: The Daodejing on Virtue and Moral Philosophy. Philosophy East and West 59 (2):pp. 173-187.
Rachel Cohon (2006). Hume on Promises and the Peculiar Act of the Mind. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (1):25-45.
Added to index2012-08-28
Total downloads3 ( #333,273 of 1,410,004 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #176,758 of 1,410,004 )
How can I increase my downloads?