Chapter 19. Misleading Defeaters

In When is True Belief Knowledge? Princeton University Press. pp. 95-98 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Defeasibility Theory.Thomas Grundmann - 2011 - In Sven Bernecker & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Epistemology. Routledge. pp. 156-166.
Misleading "misleading defeaters".Peter D. Klein - 1979 - Journal of Philosophy 76 (7):382-386.
Where there are internal defeaters, there are “confirmers”.Ralf-Thomas Klein - 2014 - Synthese 191 (12):2715-2728.
Misleading defeaters.Steven R. Levy - 1978 - Journal of Philosophy 75 (12):739-742.
Justification and Misleading Defeaters.James Cargile - 1995 - Analysis 55 (3):216 - 220.
Adequacy and Sufficiency in Explanation.Lucien Manning Garrett - 1998 - Dissertation, University of Georgia
Defeaters and rising standards of justification.Mikael Janvid - 2008 - Acta Analytica 23 (1):45-54.
Undefeated dualism.Tomas Bogardus - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (2):445-466.
Two varieties of conditionals and two kinds of defeaters help reveal two fundamental types of reasoning.Guy Politzer & J.-F. Bonnefon - 2006 - Mind and Language 21 (4):484-503.
Two Varieties of Conditionals and Two Kinds of Defeaters Help Reveal Two Fundamental Types of Reasoning.Politzer Guy & Bonnefon Jean-Francois - 2006 - Mind and Language 21 (4):484-503.
Peirce: a guide for the perplexed.Cornelis de Waal - 2013 - New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Warrant, defeaters, and the epistemic basis of religious belief.Christoph Jäger - 2005 - In Michael G. Parker and Thomas M. Schmidt (ed.), Scientific explanation and religious belief. Mohr Siebeck. pp. 81-98.
Knowledge is belief for sufficient (objective and subjective) reason.Mark Schroeder - 2015
What do you do with misleading evidence?By Michael Veber - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (217):557–569.
Richard Rorty's Metaphilosophy and the Consequences for Edifying Theology.Gary Elijah Dann - 1999 - Dissertation, University of Waterloo (Canada)

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
3 (#1,690,426)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Foley
New York University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references