Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (1):24–31 (2003)
|Abstract||Pleasure is one of the strongest candidates for an occurrence that might be good, in some respect, unconditionally. Malicious pleasure is one of the most often cited alleged counter-examples to pleasure’s being an unconditional good. Correctly evaluating malicious pleasure is more complex than people realize. I defend pleasure’s unconditionally good status from critics of malicious pleasure.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Verity Harte (2004). The Philebus on Pleasure: The Good, the Bad and the False. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (2):111–128.
Stuart Rachels (2004). Six Theses About Pleasure. Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):247-267.
Justin Klocksiem (2010). Pleasure, Desire, and Oppositeness. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy.
Gerd Van Riel (1999). Does a Perfect Activity Necessarily Yield Pleasure? An Evaluation of the Relation Between Pleasure and Activity in Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics VII and X. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (2):211 – 224.
Gerd van Riel (1999). Does a Perfect Activity Necessarily Yield Pleasure? An Evaluation of the Relation Between Pleasure and Activity in Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics VII and X. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (2):211-224.
Irwin Goldstein (1981). Cognitive Pleasure and Distress. Philosophical Studies 39 (January):15-23.
Jessica Moss (2006). Pleasure and Illusion in Plato. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (3):503 - 535.
Irwin Goldstein (1980). Why People Prefer Pleasure to Pain. Philosophy 55 (July):349-362.
Irwin Goldstein (1989). Pleasure and Pain: Unconditional Intrinsic Values. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (December):255-276.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads156 ( #3,081 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)34 ( #3,369 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?