Suppressed Subjectivity and Truncated Tradition: A Reply to Pablo Schyfter

Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7 (12):15-21 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Author's response to: Pablo Schyfter, 'Inaccurate Ambitions and Missing Methodologies: Thoughts on Jeff Kochan and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge,' Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 8 (2018): 8-14. -- Part of a book-review symposium on: Jeff Kochan (2017), Science as Social Existence: Heidegger and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge (Cambridge UK: Open Book Publishers).

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Sociology of Subjectivity: A Reply to Raphael Sassower.Jeff Kochan - 2018 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7 (5):39-41.
Symmetry, asymmetry, and the real possibility of radical change: reply to Kochan.Andrew Feenberg - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (4):721-727.
Circles of Scientific Practice: Regressus, Mathēsis, Denkstil.Jeff Kochan - 2015 - In Dimitri Ginev (ed.), Critical Science Studies after Ludwik Fleck. St. Kliment Ohridski University Press. pp. 83-99.
A critique of relativism in the sociology of scientific knowledge.Si Sun - 2007 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (1):115-130.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-12

Downloads
247 (#81,143)

6 months
70 (#68,657)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeff Kochan
Universität Konstanz

Citations of this work

Disassembling the System: A Reply to Paolo Palladino and Adam Riggio.Jeff Kochan - 2018 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7 (12):29-38.

Add more citations