Estonian studies in the history and philosophy of science
Rein Vihalemm (ed.)
Kluwer Academic Publishers (2001)
| Abstract | The primary audience for this volume is: students as well as professionals of philosophy, methodology and logic of science; history of science and science ... | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Buy the book | $138.25 new (27% off) $189.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page | |||||||||
| ISBN(s) | 0792371895 9780792371892 | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBruno Mölder (2001). Inter-Level Explanation and the Category-Mistake. In Rein Vihalemm (ed.), Estonian studies in the history and philosophy of science. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
John Losee (1987). Philosophy of Science and Historical Enquiry. Oxford University Press.
Cassandra Pinnick & George Gale (2000). Philosophy of Science and History of Science: A Troubling Interaction. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 31 (1):109-125.
Taner Edis (2006). Science and Nonbelief. Greenwood Press.
D. Wujastyk (1998). Science and Vedic Studies. Journal of Indian Philosophy 26 (4):335-345.
Thomas Nickles (ed.) (2003). Thomas Kuhn. Cambridge University Press.
Roger Ariew (1986). Descartes as Critic of Galileo's Scientific Methodology. Synthese 67 (1):77 - 90.
Oscar Moro Abadia (2008). Beyond the Whig History Interpretation of History: Lessons on 'Presentism' From Hélène Metzger Studies in History and Philosophy of Science , 39 (2), 194–201. [REVIEW] Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (4):565-565.
Franccsca di Poppa (2001). Rational Reconstructions Revised. Theoria 16 (3):461-480.
Lorenz Krüger, Thomas Sturm, Wolfgang Carl & Lorraine Daston (eds.) (2005). Why Does History Matter to Philosophy and the Sciences? Walter DeGruyter.
Peter Machamer & Franccsca Di Poppa (2001). Rational Reconstructions Revised. Theoria 16 (3):461-480.
Michael R. Matthews (1994). Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. Routledge.
Krzysztof Brzechczyn (2009). Between Science and Literature: The Debate on the Status of History. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 97 (1):7-30.
K. Brad Wray (2005). Philosophy of Science After Mirowski's History of the Philosophy of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (4):779-789.
Rachel Laudan (1992). The 'New' History of Science: Implications for Philosophy of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:476 - 481.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-10-07Total downloads1 ( #274,921 of 549,122 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,122 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
