Search results for 'David Rosenberg' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  27
    Alex Rosenberg (1992). Selection and Science: Critical Notice of David Hull's Science as a Process. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 7 (2):217-228.
    An examination of Hull's claims about the nature of interactors, replicators and selection, with special attention to how the genetic material realizes the first two types, and a critique of Hull's attempt to apply the theory of natural selection to the explanation of scientific change, and in particular the succession of theories. I conclude that difficulties attending the molecular instantiation of Hull's theory are vastly increased when it comes to be applied to memes.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  2.  3
    Thomas E. Hill, Gerald J. Postema & Jay F. Rosenberg (1992). W. David Falk 1906-1991. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 66 (1):25 - 27.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Charles E. Rosenberg & John A. Robertson (forthcoming). David W. Kissane is an Academic. Hastings Center Report.
  4.  13
    David Braybrooke & Alexander Rosenberg (1972). Review Symposium : IV—Anti-Behaviourism in the Hour of its Disintegration. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 2 (1):355-363.
  5. Alex Rosenberg & David Michael Kaplan (2005). How to Reconcile Physicalism and Antireductionism About Biology. Philosophy of Science 72 (1):43-68.
    Physicalism and antireductionism are the ruling orthodoxy in the philosophy of biology. But these two theses are difficult to reconcile. Merely embracing an epistemic antireductionism will not suffice, as both reductionists and antireductionists accept that given our cognitive interests and limitations, non-molecular explanations may not be improved, corrected or grounded in molecular ones. Moreover, antireductionists themselves view their claim as a metaphysical or ontological one about the existence of facts molecular biology cannot identify, express, or explain. However, this is tantamount (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  6.  10
    Kenneth S. Reinker & David Rosenberg (2011). Improve Medical Malpractice Law by Letting Health Care Insurers Take Charge. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (3):539-542.
    This essay discusses unlimited insurance subrogation (UIS) as a means of improving the deterrence and compensation results of medical malpractice law. Under UIS, health care insureds could assign their entire potential medical malpractice claims to their first-party commercial and government insurers. UIS should improve deterrence by establishing first-party insurers as plaintiffs to confront liability insurers on the defense side, leading to more effective prosecution of meritorious claims and reducing meritless and unnecessary litigation. UIS should improve compensation outcomes by converting litigation (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. David Snowden Goodwin, Geoffrey Hodgson, Peter Allen, Haridimos Tsoukas, Max Boisot, Jack Cohen & Duska Rosenberg (2000). At the Close of Our Second Year, Emergence is Pleased to Present This Special Issue on Knowledge Management. To. Emergence: Complexity and Organization 2 (4):3-4.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Kenneth S. Reinker & David Rosenberg (2011). Improve Medical Malpractice Law by Letting Health Care Insurers Take Charge. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):539-542.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. David L. Wenzler & Bradley H. Rosenberg (2014). Urologists' Personal Feelings on PSA Screening and Prostate Cancer Treatment. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 20 (4):408-410.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  9
    E. G. Turner, M. David, B. A. van Groningen, J. C. van Oven, E. Boswinkel, E. P. Wegener, A. H. R. E. Paap, M. Hombert & Cl Preaux (1953). Papyrologica Lugduno-Batava, edidit Institutum Papyrologicum Universitatis Lugduno-Batavae, moderantibus M. David, B. A. van Groningen, J. C. van Oven. I. The Warren PapyriPapyrologica Lugduno-Batava, edidit Institutum Papyrologicum Universitatis Lugduno-Batavae, moderantibus M. David, B. A. van Groningen, J. C. van Oven. II. Einige Wiener PapyriPapyrologica Lugduno-Batava, edidit Institutum Papyrologicum Universitatis Lugduno-Batavae, moderantibus M. David, B. A. van Groningen, J. C. van Oven. III. Some Oxford PapyriPapyrologica Lugduno-Batava, edidit Institutum Papyrologicum Universitatis Lugduno-Batavae, moderantibus M. David, B. A. van Groningen, J. C. van Oven. IV. De Herodoti reliquiis in papyris et membranis Aegyptiis servatisPapyrologica Lugduno-Batava, edidit Institutum Papyrologicum Universitatis Lugduno-Batavae, moderantibus M. David, B. A. van Groningen, J. C. van Oven. V. Recherches sur le Recensement dans l'Egypte romaine Papyrologica Lugduno-Batava, edidit Institutum Pap. [REVIEW] Journal of Hellenic Studies 73:163.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  32
    Alexander Rosenberg (1986). What Rosenberg's Philosophy of Economics is Not. Philosophy of Science 53 (1):127-132.
  12.  7
    Evans David (2007). The Ethics of War Richard Sorabji & David Rodin (Eds.) Ashgate, 2006, Pp. IX+ 253. Philosophy 82 (2):370.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  16
    Thomas Frangenberg & Ludovico David (1994). The Geometry of a Dome: Ludovico David 's Dichiarazione Della Pittura Della Capella Del Collegio Clementino di Roma. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 57:191-208.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  6
    Alexander Rosenberg (1982). Book Review:Sociobiology and the Preemption of Social Science Alexander Rosenberg. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 49 (4):648-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. García Bacca & Juan David (2002). Ensayos y Estudios de Juan David García Bacca. Fundación Para la Cultura Urbana.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Maxime David & L. Lévy-Bruhl (1912). David Hume. Œuvres philosophiques choisies. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 20 (3):6-7.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Archard David (forthcoming). Should We Teach Patriotism?/David Archard. Studies in Philosophy and Education.–Ny.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Alexander Rosenberg (1988). ERRATUM TO ROSENBERG Vol. 14, No. 2, P. 127 Bottom: Intentional Psychology and Evolutionary Biology: Part II: The Crucial Disanalogy. [REVIEW] Behaviorism 16 (1):97-97.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Jay F. Rosenberg (1984). The Practice of Philosophy a Handbook for Beginners /Jay F. Rosenberg. --. --. Prentice-Hall,1984.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Warren F. Schwartz (2003). Can Suits with Negative Expected Value Really Be Profitable? I Wish to Acknowledge My Debt to Kevin Lippert for His Important Contribution to the Writing of This Article. Kevin, a Student in My Law and Economics Workshop, Wrote a Thoughtful Paper Evaluating the Theoretical Argument Advanced by David Rosenberg and Steven Shavell in Their: A Model in Which Suits Are Brought for Their Nuisance Value, 5 Intl Rev. L. Econ. 3(1985).(The Paper Was Jointly Awarded the Prize for the Best Student Paper in the ... [REVIEW] Legal Theory 9 (2):83-97.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  4
    William Calin (1998). Samuel N. Rosenberg and Samuel Danon, Transs., Ami and Amile: A Medieval Tale of Friendship. Afterword by David Konstan. (Stylus: Studies in Medieval Culture.) Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press, 1996. Pp. Ix, 158. $39.50 (Cloth); $19.95 (Paper). First Published in 1981 by French Literature Publications. [REVIEW] Speculum 73 (3):890-890.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  3
    John Smith Jr (2000). Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in Twentieth-Century America by David C. Mowery; Nathan Rosenberg. [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 91:409-409.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Desirée Hirst (1997). Private David Jones and Private Isaac Rosenberg. The Chesterton Review 23 (1/2):139-145.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  24
    David L. Hull (1992). An Evolutionary Account of Science: A Response to Rosenberg's Critical Notice. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 7 (2):229-236.
    In his critical notice, Rosenberg (1991) raises three objections to my evolutionary account of science: whether it is more than a week metaphor, the compatibility of my past objections to reduction and my current advocacy of viewing selection in terms of replication and interaction, and finally, the feasibility of identifying appropriate replicators and interactors in biological evolution, let alone conceptual evolution. I discuss each of these objections in turn.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  29
    Angela Coventry (2010). Hume's System of Space and Time. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 13.
    David Hume’s views on topics such as causation, free will, personal identity, scepticism and morals are without doubt all significant contributions to philosophy. However, his account of the origin and nature of our ideas of space and time has never been influential (Rosenberg 1993, 82). In fact, the account of space and time is generally thought to be the least satisfactory part of his empiricist system of philosophy (Kemp Smith, 1941: 287, Noxon 1973, 115 and Flew 1986, 38). (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Courtney David Fugate (2006). Jay F. Rosenberg, Accessing Kant: A Relaxed Introduction to the Critique of Pure Reason Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 26 (5):377-379.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  15
    David K. Henderson (1996). Comments on Rosenberg's Paper. Southern Journal of Philosophy 34 (S1):205-216.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  11
    David B. Resnik (2005). Alexander Rosenberg, Darwinism in Philosophy, Social Science, and Policy:Darwinism in Philosophy, Social Science, and Policy. Ethics 115 (4):843-845.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. David B. Resnik (1987). ROSENBERG, ALEXANDER: "The Structure of Biological Science". [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38:119.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Nathan Salmon, Andrew Melnyk, Trenton Merricks, John Stuart Mill, Matt Millen, Ruth G. Millikan, Piet Mondrian, Isaac Newton, David Owens & David Papineau (2002). Ramsey 311,314 Rembrandt 388 Rosenberg, Alexander Xxi Ross, WD. 274. In Jaegwon Kim (ed.), Supervenience. Ashgate 397.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  49
    Katherine Hawley (forthcoming). David Lewis on Persistence. In Barry Loewer & Jonathan Schaffer (eds.), A Companion to David Lewis. Wiley-Blackwell 237-49.
    This paper provides an overview on David Lewis's writings about persistence. I focus on two issues. First, what is the relationship between the doctrine of Humean Supervenience and the rejection of endurantism? Second, why did Lewis not adopt a stage theory of persistence, given that he advocated a counterpart theory of modality?
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  12
    Basil Hiley & F. David Peat (eds.) (1991). Quantum Implications: Essays in Honour of David Bohm. Routledge.
    David Bohm is one of the foremost scientific thinkers of today and one of the most distinguished scientists of his generation. His challenge to the conventional understanding of quantum theory has led scientists to reexamine what it is they are going and his ideas have been an inspiration across a wide range of disciplines. Quantum Implications is a collection of original contributions by many of the world' s leading scholars and is dedicated to David (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33. Massimo Pigliucci (2014). 5 Questions on Science & Religion. In Gregg D. Caruso (ed.), 5 Questions on Science & Religion. Automatic Press 163-170.
    Are science and religion compatible when it comes to understanding cosmology (the origin of the universe), biology (the origin of life and of the human species), ethics, and the human mind (minds, brains, souls, and free will)? Do science and religion occupy non-overlapping magisteria? Is Intelligent Design a scientific theory? How do the various faith traditions view the relationship between science and religion? What, if any, are the limits of scientific explanation? What are the most important open questions, problems, or (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  32
    Benj Hellie (forthcoming). David Lewis and the Kangaroo: Graphing Philosophical Progress. In Russell Blackford & Damien Broderick (eds.), Philosophy's Future: The Problem of Philosophical Progress. Blackwell
    Data-driven historiography of philosophy looks to objective modeling tools for illumination of the propagation of influence. While the system of David Lewis, the most influential philosopher of our time, raises historiographic puzzles to stymie conventional analytic methods, it proves amenable to data-driven analysis. A striking result is that Lewis only becomes the metaphysician of current legend following the midpoint of his career: his initial project is to frame a descriptive science of mind and meaning; the transition to metaphysics (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  63
    Matthew C. Haug (ed.) (2013). Philosophical Methodology: The Armchair or the Laboratory? Routledge.
    What methodology should philosophers follow? Should they rely on methods that can be conducted from the armchair? Or should they leave the armchair and turn to the methods of the natural sciences, such as experiments in the laboratory? Or is this opposition itself a false one? Arguments about philosophical methodology are raging in the wake of a number of often conflicting currents, such as the growth of experimental philosophy, the resurgence of interest in metaphysical questions, and the use of formal (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  36. Werner Callebaut (ed.) (1993). Taking the Naturalistic Turn, or How Real Philosophy of Science is Done. University of Chicago Press.
    Philosophers of science traditionally have ignored the details of scientific research, and the result has often been theories that lack relevance either to science or to philosophy in general. In this volume, leading philosophers of biology discuss the limitations of this tradition and the advantages of the "naturalistic turn"—the idea that the study of science is itself a scientific enterprise and should be conducted accordingly. This innovative book presents candid, informal debates among scholars who examine the benefits and problems of (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  37. Anthony Skelton (2013). Sidgwick’s Argument for Utilitarianism and His Moral Epistemology: A Reply to David Phillips. Revue d'Etudes Benthamiennes 12.
    David Phillips’s Sidgwickian Ethics is a penetrating contribution to the scholarly and philosophical understanding of Henry Sidgwick’s The Methods of Ethics. This note focuses on Phillips’s understanding of (aspects of) Sidgwick’s argument for utilitarianism and the moral epistemology to which he subscribes. In § I, I briefly outline the basic features of the argument that Sidgwick provides for utilitarianism, noting some disagreements with Phillips along the way. In § II, I raise some objections to Phillips’s account of the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38. Phillip Bricker (2006). David Lewis: On the Plurality of Worlds. In John Shand (ed.), Central Works of Philosophy, Vol. 5: The Twentieth Century: Quine and After. Acumen Publishing
    David Lewis's book 'On the Plurality of Worlds' mounts an extended defense of the thesis of modal realism, that the world we inhabit the entire cosmos of which we are a part is but one of a vast plurality of worlds, or cosmoi, all causally and spatiotemporally isolated from one another. The purpose of this article is to provide an accessible summary of the main positions and arguments in Lewis's book.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  29
    Louis Derosset (2011). On the Plurality of Worlds: David Lewis. [REVIEW] Humana.Mente 19.
    A commentary on David Lewis's /On the Plurality of Worlds/.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  5
    David Fate Norton (1984). David Hume: Common-Sense Moralist, Sceptical Metaphysician. Philosophical Review 93 (3):444-446.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  41.  65
    Uwe Steinhoff, A Critique of David Miller's Like Minded Group and Cooperative Practice Models of Collective Responsibility.
    Many authors writing about global justice seem to take national responsibility more or less for granted. Most of them, however, offer very little argument for their position. One of the few exceptions is David Miller. He offers two models of collective responsibility: the like-minded group model and the cooperative practice model. While some authors have criticized whether these two models are applicable to nations, as Miller intends, my criticism is more radical: I argue that these two models fail (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Katalin Balog (2000). Phenomenal Judgment and the HOT Theory: Comments on David Rosenthal’s “Consciousness, Content, and Metacognitive Judgments”. Consciousness and Cognition 9 (2):215-219.
    In this commentary I criticize David Rosenthal’s higher order thought theory of consciousness . This is one of the best articulated philosophical accounts of consciousness available. The theory is, roughly, that a mental state is conscious in virtue of there being another mental state, namely, a thought to the effect that one is in the first state. I argue that this account is open to the objection that it makes “HOT-zombies” possible, i.e., creatures that token higher order mental (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43.  99
    David Gauthier (1979). David Hume, Contractarian. Philosophical Review 88 (1):3-38.
  44.  18
    Christian Forstner (2008). The Early History of David Bohm's Quantum Mechanics Through the Perspective of Ludwik Fleck's Thought-Collectives. Minerva 46 (2):215-229.
    This paper analyses the early history of David Bohm’s mechanics from the perspective of Ludwik Fleck’s thought-collectives and shows how the thought-style of the scientific community limits the possible modes of thinking and what new possibilities for the construction of a new theory arise if these limits are removed.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  45.  32
    Mark Hanin (2012). Naturalistic Moral Realism and Moral Disagreement: David Copp's Account. Res Publica 18 (4):283-301.
    To enhance the plausibility of naturalistic moral realism, David Copp develops an argument from epistemic defeaters aiming to show that strongly a priori synthetic moral truths do not exist. In making a case for the non-naturalistic position, I locate Copp’s account within the wider literature on peer disagreement; I identify key points of divergence between Copp’s doctrine and conciliatorist doctrines; I introduce the notion of ‘minimal moral competence’; I contend that some plausible benchmarks for minimal moral competence are (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46.  13
    Nathan Ballantyne & Justin Tosi (2015). David Foster Wallace on the Good Life. In Steven M. Cahn & Maureen Eckert (eds.), Freedom and the Self: Essays on the Philosophy of David Foster Wallace. Columbia University Press 133-168.
  47.  3
    Jason Martin Wirth (2016). David Pollard and Philosophy. Research in Phenomenology 46 (1):117-134.
    _ Source: _Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 117 - 134 This essay attends to both the critical and poetic work of David Pollard. In so doing, it not only engages the works themselves, but also allows the contours of such an engagement to manifest themselves, both with regards to the works at hand and more broadly. What does reading and thinking with Pollard give us to experience about reading and thinking as such?
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  2
    Mike VanQuickenborne (2016). Everyday Examples: An Introduction to Philosophy, by David Cunning. Teaching Philosophy 39 (1):106-110.
    Everyday Examples. An Introduction to Philosophy. presents the student with a somewhat unorthodox approach to the grand themes of philosophy. David Cunning has chosen an alternate route into many of the standard questions put to those in an introduction to philosophy course, both organizationally and content-wise. It will be quickly evident to the instructor that this approach has both its advantages and disadvantages.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  82
    Reviews by Robert Stecker & John Dilworth (2005). David Davies, Art as Performance. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (1):75–80.
    In his absorbing book Art as Performance, David Davies argues that artworks should be identified, not with artistic products such as paintings or novels, but instead with the artistic actions or processes that produced such items. Such a view had an earlier incarnation in Currie’s widely criticized “action type hypothesis”, but Davies argues that it is instead action tokens rather than types with which artworks should be identified. This rich and complex work repays the closest study in spite (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  50.  77
    Barry Maguire (2013). Defending David Lewis's Modal Reduction. Philosophical Studies 166 (1):129-147.
    David Lewis claims that his theory of modality successfully reduces modal items to nonmodal items. This essay will clarify this claim and argue that it is true. This is largely an exercise within ‘Ludovician Polycosmology’: I hope to show that a certain intuitive resistance to the reduction and a set of related objections misunderstand the nature of the Ludovician project. But these results are of broad interest since they show that would-be reductionists have more formidable argumentative resources than (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000