Das Denken Martin Heideggers ist von der Auseinandersetzung mit der antiken Philosophie geprägt. Die klassischen Texte werden jedoch nicht bloß als historische Dokumente aus einer fernen Zeit verstanden, sondern vielmehr als Grundtexte, die dem heutigen Philosophieren etwas zu sagen haben. Gerade dem Anfang der Geschichte gilt es laut Heidegger nachzuspüren, um die Ausprägung der ontologischen Grundbegriffe deutlich zu machen und sich von dort her Alternativen für ein zukünftiges Denken aufgeben zu lassen. Dieser Band versammelt unterschiedliche Bezugnahmen auf Heideggers Lektüre der (...) Antike von Heraklit über Platon und Aristoteles bis hin zu Augustinus, die den Verlauf seiner Gespräche durchleuchten und hinterfragen, ja im besten Fall in eigenständiger Weise fortzuführen im Stande sind. (shrink)

The post-modern pleading for radical pluralism has an ant-itotalitarian intention: it is directed against the idea of a unitary science as well as against the idea of a progress in history and demands the acception of the otherness of the other. Because the postmodern concept of pluralism shares with the totalitarian concept of unity (oppposed by it) the same presupposition -the anti-thesis of singularity and pluraility- the concept of pluralism is itself totalitarian. Whereas participative unity does not exclude diversity, but (...) includes it. The practical relevance of the concept of participation is that it is not subject to the dialectic of diversity negating unity and unity negating diversity, because wherein everything comes together is exactly wherin everything is distinguished. A true pleading for plurality includes concern about community. (shrink)

The present study "Over the principle of the action" sign how the practical principles of the action tell us something about the fundamental structure of the action, responding to what signified to act, trying subjects as action as response, the subject of action, the good, the human liberty...

The Proslogion argument is often still considered as an ontological proof of the existence of God or as its predecessor. Doubtless this misinterpretation does not strike the root of the matter. Anselm requests to reflect upon what is and has always been present to reasoning in an unthematically way. Proslogion chapt. 2 reflects upon the difference between only being thought and being, and points out the characteristic feature of reasoning – to be the disclosure of being. Proslogion chapt. 3 reflects (...) upon the difference between being as being and its origin. Id quo nihil maius cogitari potest is not the highest thinkable (summum cogitabile) but what is showing itself while withdrawing from reasoning. (shrink)