Call of Duty at the Frontier of Research: Normative Epistemology for High-Risk/High-Gain Studies of Deep Brain Stimulation

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 27 (4):647-659 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deep Brain Stimulation, Authenticity and Value—CORRIGENDUM.Jonathan Pugh, Hannah Maslen & Julian Savulescu - 2018 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 27 (1):179-179.
Teens and Research.Carolyn Plunkett Neuhaus - 2016 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 25 (4):659-673.
Deep Brain Stimulation: Paradoxes and a Plea.Judy Illes - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 3 (1):65-70.
Treading carefully on the moral high ground.M. L. Gross - 2001 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (1):99.
Guest Editorial: Neuroethics—From Neurotechnology to Healthcare.Judy Illes & Eric Racine - 2007 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (2):125-128.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-11

Downloads
16 (#227,957)

6 months
2 (#1,816,284)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?