In Right Research: Modelling Sustainable Research Practices in the Anthropocene. United Kingdom: Open Book Publishers. pp. 435–462 (2021)
AbstractPhilosophers have probably been organizing conferences since at least the time of Plato’s academy (Barnes, 1998). More recently, philosophers have brought some of their conferences online (e.g., Brown, 2009; Buckner, Byrd, Rushing, & Schwenkler, 2017; Calzavarini & Viola, 2018; Nadelhoffer, 2006). However, the adoption of online conferences is limited. One might wonder if scholars prefer traditional conferences for their ability to provide goods that online conferences cannot. While this may be true, online conferences outshine traditional conferences in various ways, and at a significantly lower cost. By considering the costs and benefits of both conference models, we may find reasons to prefer online to traditional conferences in some circumstances. This paper shares the methods, quantitative results, and qualitative results of the Minds Online conferences of 2015, 2016, and 2017. The evidence suggests that the online conference model can help scholars better understand their profession, share the workload of conference organizing, increase representation for underrepresented groups, increase accessibility to attendees, decrease monetary costs for everyone involved, sustain conference activity during states of emergency, and reduce their carbon footprint. So, the advantages of traditional conferences might be outweighed by their higher costs after all.
Similar books and articles
Using Video Conferences for ESP Postgraduate Students: An Example of Distance Learning at the University of Tlemcen/ Algeria.Abdelkader Bensafa - 2014 - Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala 6 (2):79-95.
The Tensions between Second-Order Cybernetics and Traditional Academic Conferences.D. Griffiths & P. Baron - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (1):86-88.
Information Societies, Ethical Enquiries.Mariarosaria Taddeo & Elizabeth Buchanan - 2015 - Philosophy and Technology 28 (1):5-10.
Undergraduate Conferences as High Impact Practices with an Impact on Gender Parity.W. John Koolage & Danielle Clevenger - 2018 - Teaching Philosophy 41 (3):261-284.
Designing Academic Conferences as a Learning Environment: How to Stimulate Active Learning at Academic Conferences?J. Verbeke - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (1):98-105.
Afterthoughts on the Sensuous Knowledge Conferences.S. Kjørup - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (1):110-112.
The smiling philosopher: Emotional labor, gender, and harassment in conference spaces.Liz Jackson - 2017 - Educational Philosophy and Theory:1-9.
The smiling philosopher: Emotional labor, gender, and harassment in conference spaces.Liz Jackson - 2019 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (7):693-701.
Philosophie Et Démocratie en Perspective Interculturelle.Heinz Kimmerle & Franz Martin Wimmer (eds.) - 1997 - Rodopi.
Conference Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing.Shahryar Sorooshian - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (6):1805-1806.
Gender at Critical Realism Conferences.Caroline New & Steve Fleetwood - 2006 - Journal of Critical Realism 5 (1):61-91.
Fake/Bogus Conferences: Their Features and Some Subtle Ways to Differentiate Them from Real Ones.Amin Asadi, Nader Rahbar, Mohammad Javad Rezvani & Fahime Asadi - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (2):779-784.
Desires, Constraints and Designing Second-Order Cybernetic Conferences.M. Hohl - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (1):84-85.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Quantifying the Gender Gap: An Empirical Study of the Underrepresentation of Women in Philosophy.Molly Paxton, Carrie Figdor & Valerie Tiberius - 2012 - Hypatia 27 (4):949-957.
What we can (and can’t) infer about implicit bias from debiasing experiments.Nick Byrd - 2019 - Synthese (2):1-29.
What is the State of Blacks in Philosophy?Tina F. Botts, Liam K. Bright, Guntur Mallarangeng, Quayshawn Spencer & Myisha Cherry - 2014 - Critical Philosophy of Race 2 (2):224-242.