Assertion, knowledge, and context

Philosophical Review 111 (2):167-203 (2002)
This paper uses the knowledge account of assertion (KAA) in defense of epistemological contextualism. Part 1 explores the main problem afflicting contextualism, what I call the "Generality Objection." Part 2 presents and defends both KAA and a powerful new positive argument that it provides for contextualism. Part 3 uses KAA to answer the Generality Objection, and also casts other shadows over the prospects for anti-contextualism.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0031-8108  
DOI 10.1215/00318108-111-2-167
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,520
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Nonindexical Contextualism.John MacFarlane - 2009 - Synthese 166 (2):231-250.
Norms of Assertion.Jennifer Lackey - 2007 - Noûs 41 (4):594–626.
Knowledge and Suberogatory Assertion.John Turri - 2013 - Philosophical Studies (3):1-11.

View all 129 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
591 ( #2,503 of 2,180,839 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #10,602 of 2,180,839 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums