Neuroethics 8 (2):139-151 (2015)

Farah Focquaert
University of Ghent
One of the reasons why moral enhancement may be controversial, is because the advantages of moral enhancement may fall upon society rather than on those who are enhanced. If directed at individuals with certain counter-moral traits it may have direct societal benefits by lowering immoral behavior and increasing public safety, but it is not directly clear if this also benefits the individual in question. In this paper, we will discuss what we consider to be moral enhancement, how different means may be used to achieve it and whether the means we employ to reach moral enhancement matter morally. Are certain means to achieve moral enhancement wrong in themselves? Are certain means to achieve moral enhancement better than others, and if so, why? More specifically, we will investigate whether the difference between direct and indirect moral enhancement matters morally. Is it the case that indirect means are morally preferable to direct means of moral enhancement and can we indeed pinpoint relevant intrinsic, moral differences between both? We argue that the distinction between direct and indirect means is indeed morally relevant, but only insofar as it tracks an underlying distinction between active and passive interventions. Although passive interventions can be ethical provided specific safeguards are put in place, these interventions exhibit a greater potential to compromise autonomy and disrupt identity
Keywords Moral enhancement  Enhancement  Bioenhancement  Biomedical enhancement  Identity  Autonomy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12152-015-9230-y
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,046
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Constitution of Selves.Marya Schechtman (ed.) - 1996 - Cornell University Press.
Neuroethics: Challenges for the 21st Century.Neil Levy - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
Moral Enhancement and Freedom.John Harris - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (2):102-111.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Deep Brain Stimulation, Authenticity and Value.Pugh Jonathan, Maslen Hannah & Savulescu Julian - 2017 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (4):640-657.

View all 32 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
104 ( #104,817 of 2,454,489 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #98,283 of 2,454,489 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes