Continuous Glucose Monitoring as a Matter of Justice

HEC Forum:1-26 (forthcoming)

Authors
Steven R. Kraaijeveld
Wageningen University and Research
Abstract
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a chronic illness that requires intensive lifelong management of blood glucose concentrations by means of external insulin administration. There have been substantial developments in the ways of measuring glucose levels, which is crucial to T1D self-management. Recently, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has allowed people with T1D to keep track of their blood glucose levels in near real-time. These devices have alarms that warn users about potentially dangerous blood glucose trends, which can often be shared with ther people. CGM is consistently associated with improved glycemic control and reduced hypoglycemia and is currently recommended by doctors. However, due to the costs of CGM, only those who qualify for hospital provision or those who can personally afford it are able to use it, which excludes many people. In this paper, I argue that unequal access to CGM results in: (1) unjust health inequalities, (2) relational injustice, (3) injustice with regard to agency and autonomy, and (4) epistemic injustice. These considerations provide prima facie moral reasons why all people with T1D should have access to CGM technology. I discuss the specific case of CGM policy in the Netherlands, which currently only provides coverage for a small group of people with T1D, and argue that, especially with additional considerations of cost-effectiveness, the Dutch government ought to include CGM in basic health care insurance for all people with T1D.
Keywords type 1 diabetes  continuous glucose monitoring  justice  access to health care  health care ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10730-020-09413-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Epistemic Injustice and Illness.Ian James Kidd & Havi Carel - 2017 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (2):172-190.
Epistemic Injustice in Healthcare: A Philosophical Analysis.Ian James Kidd & Havi Carel - 2014 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (4):529-540.
Justice, Health, and Healthcare.Norman Daniels - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (2):2 – 16.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Justice and Access to Health Care.Norman Daniels - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Just Health Care : Is Equality Too Much?Leonard M. Fleck - 1989 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 10 (4).
Broadening the Bioethics Agenda.Dan W. Brock - 2000 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (1):21-38.
Priorities in the Israeli Health Care System.Frida Simonstein - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):341-347.
Justice and Health Care: Selected Essays. [REVIEW]Roger Stanev - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (2):137-142.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-05-21

Total views
20 ( #477,165 of 2,310,327 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #37,278 of 2,310,327 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature