Instrumental Rationality in the Social Sciences

Philosophy of the Social Sciences (1):46-68 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper draws some bold conclusions from modest premises. My topic is an old one, the Neohumean view of practical rationality. First, I show that this view consists of two independent claims, instrumentalism and subjectivism. Most critics run these together. Instrumentalism is entailed by many theories beyond Neohumeanism, viz. by any theory that says rational actions maximize something. Second, I give a new argument against instrumentalism, using simple counterexamples. This argument systematically undermines consequentialism and rational choice theory, I show, using detailed examples of their many social science applications. There is no obvious fix.

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

537 (#36,174)

6 months
344 (#5,924)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Katharina Nieswandt
Concordia University

Citations of this work

Instrumentalism in the Social and Moral Sciences.Michael Moehler - forthcoming - Philosophy of the Social Sciences.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A treatise of human nature.David Hume & A. D. Lindsay - 1969 - Harmondsworth,: Penguin Books. Edited by Ernest Campbell Mossner.
The possibility of altruism.Thomas Nagel - 1970 - Oxford,: Clarendon P..
Famine, affluence, and morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3):229-243.
Modern Moral Philosophy.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1958 - Philosophy 33 (124):1 - 19.
Consequentialism.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 37 references / Add more references