Theistic Arguments from Horrendous Evils

Philosophy Compass 17 (8):e12866 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While the existence of horrendous evils has generally been taken to be evidence against the existence of God, some philosophers have suggested that it may be evidence for the existence of God. This paper introduces three main kinds of theistic arguments from horrendous evils: the argument from objectively horrifying evils, the pragmatic argument from evil, and an argument from reasonable responses. For each of these arguments, I will first reconstruct a standard version of the argument, before suggesting ways the argument may be challenged, or further developed.

Similar books and articles

Divine intimacy and the problem of horrendous evil.Dennis Earl - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (1):17-28.
Horrendous evils and the goodness of God.Philip L. Quinn - 2001 - Philosophical Review 110 (3):476-479.
Evidentialism, Stubborn Counterevidence and Horrendous Evils.Daryl Ooi - 2021 - Australasian Philosophical Review 5 (1):92-97.
Evil, Meaning and Meaning-Makers.Daniel Ambord - 2010 - Ars Disputandi 10:38-49.
Horrendous evils and the goodness of God.Marilyn McCord Adams - 1989 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. Edited by Eleonore Stump & Michael J. Murray.
Small Evils and Live Options.Spencer Case - 2020 - Philosophia Christi 22 (2):307-321.
Horrendous Evils and The Goodness of God.Marilyn McCord Adams & Stewart Sutherland - 1989 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 63 (1):297-323.
Horrendous Evils and the Goodness of God. [REVIEW]Brian Davies - 2001 - Faith and Philosophy 18 (3):390-394.
Disability and the Theodicy of Defeat.Aaron D. Cobb & Kevin Timpe - 2017 - Journal of Analytic Theology 5:100-120.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-07

Downloads
545 (#25,253)

6 months
238 (#5,083)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daryl Ooi
National University of Singapore

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism.David Enoch - 2011 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Moral realism: a defence.Russ Shafer-Landau - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
A Darwinian dilemma for realist theories of value.Sharon Street - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 127 (1):109-166.
Moral realism.Peter Railton - 1986 - Philosophical Review 95 (2):163-207.

View all 39 references / Add more references