Biology and Philosophy 5 (3):293-311 (1990)

Authors
Marga Vicedo
University of Toronto
Abstract
T. H. Morgan (1866–1945), the founder of the Drosophila research group in genetics that established the chromosome theory of Mendelian inheritance, has been described as a radical empiricist in the historical literature. His empiricism, furthermore, is supposed to have prejudiced him against certain scientific conclusions. This paper aims to show two things: first, that the sense in which the term empiricism has been used by scholars is too weak to be illuminating. It is necessary to distinguish between empiricism as an epistemological position and the so-called methodological empiricism. I will argue that the way the latter has been presented cannot distinguish an empiricist methodology from a non-empiricist one. Second, I will show that T. H. Morgan was not an epistemological empiricist as this term is usually defined in philosophy. The reason is that he believed in the existence of genes as material entities when they were unobservable entities when they were unobservable entities introduced to account for the phenotypic ratios found in breeding experiments. These two points, of course, are interrelated. If we were to water down the meaning of empiricis, perhaps we could call Morgan an empiricist. But then we would also fail to distinguish empiricism from realism.
Keywords Epistemological empiricism  methodological empiricism  realism  genes  T. H. Morgan
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00165255
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,147
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Interfield Theories.Lindley Darden & Nancy Maull - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (1):43-64.
What is a Gene?Raphael Falk - 1986 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 17 (2):133.
The Embryological Origins of the Gene Theory.Scott F. Gilbert - 1978 - Journal of the History of Biology 11 (2):307-351.
Thomas Hunt Morgan, The Man and His Science.Lindley Darden - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (4):662-666.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Role of Theory in Experimental Life.Nils Roll-Hansen - 1995 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 26 (4):673-679.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Desgabets as a Cartesian Empiricist.Monte Cook - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4):pp. 501-515.
Empiricism, Time-Awareness, and Hume's Manners of Disposition.Adrian Bardon - 2007 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 5 (1):47-63.
Empiricism, Conservativeness, and Quasi-Truth.Otávio Bueno - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):485.
Studies in Scientific Realism.Stathis Psillos - 2001 - Foundations of Chemistry 3 (1):79-86.
Empiricist Word Learning.Dan Ryder & Oleg V. Favorov - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1117-1117.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
85 ( #107,536 of 2,324,692 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #138,155 of 2,324,692 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes