Biology and Philosophy 5 (3):293-311 (1990)
T. H. Morgan (1866–1945), the founder of the Drosophila research group in genetics that established the chromosome theory of Mendelian inheritance, has been described as a radical empiricist in the historical literature. His empiricism, furthermore, is supposed to have prejudiced him against certain scientific conclusions. This paper aims to show two things: first, that the sense in which the term empiricism has been used by scholars is too weak to be illuminating. It is necessary to distinguish between empiricism as an epistemological position and the so-called methodological empiricism. I will argue that the way the latter has been presented cannot distinguish an empiricist methodology from a non-empiricist one. Second, I will show that T. H. Morgan was not an epistemological empiricist as this term is usually defined in philosophy. The reason is that he believed in the existence of genes as material entities when they were unobservable entities when they were unobservable entities introduced to account for the phenotypic ratios found in breeding experiments. These two points, of course, are interrelated. If we were to water down the meaning of empiricis, perhaps we could call Morgan an empiricist. But then we would also fail to distinguish empiricism from realism.
|Keywords||Epistemological empiricism methodological empiricism realism genes T. H. Morgan|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
What is a Gene?Raphael Falk - 1986 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 17 (2):133-173.
Realism and Simplicity in the Castle-East Debate on the Stability of the Hereditary Units: Rhetorical Devices Versus Substantive Methodology.M. Vicedo - 1991 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 22 (2):201.
Research Note: Genes on Chromosomes: The Conversion of Thomas Hunt Morgan. [REVIEW]Muriel Lederman - 1989 - Journal of the History of Biology 22 (1):163-176.
Book Review:Thomas Hunt Morgan, The Man and His Science Garland E. Allen. [REVIEW]Lindley Darden - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (4):662-.
Citations of this work BETA
Philosophical Ideas and Scientific Practice: A Note on the Empiricism of T.H. Morgan. [REVIEW]N. Roll-Hansen - 1992 - Biology and Philosophy 7 (1):69-76.
The Role of Theory in Experimental Life.Nils Roll-Hansen - 1995 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 26 (4):673-679.
Similar books and articles
Constructive Empiricism and Epistemic Modesty: Response to van Fraassen and Monton. [REVIEW]Marc Alspector-Kelly - 2006 - Erkenntnis 64 (3):371-379.
Empiricist Word Learning.Dan Ryder & Oleg V. Favorov - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1117-1117.
Empiricism, Conservativeness, and Quasi-Truth.Otávio Bueno - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):485.
Empiricism, Time-Awareness, and Hume's Manners of Disposition.Adrian Bardon - 2007 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 5 (1):47-63.
Desgabets as a Cartesian Empiricist.Monte Cook - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4):pp. 501-515.
Should the Empiricist Be a Constructive Empiricist?Marc Alspector-Kelly - 2001 - Philosophy of Science 68 (4):413-431.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #158,863 of 2,146,811 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #385,701 of 2,146,811 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.