5 found
See also
Profile: Cheryl Misak (University of Toronto)
  1. Making Disagreement Matter: Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy.Cheryl J. Misak - 2004 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 18 (1):9 - 22.
  2.  11
    Narrative Evidence and Evidence‐Based Medicine.Cheryl J. Misak - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):392-397.
  3.  11
    Medically Inappropriate or Futile Treatment: Deliberation and Justification.Cheryl J. Misak, Douglas B. White & Robert D. Truog - 2016 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (1):90-114.
    This paper reframes the futility debate, moving away from the question “Who decides when to end what is considered to be a medically inappropriate or futile treatment?” and toward the question “How can society make policy that will best account for the multitude of values and conflicts involved in such decision-making?” It offers a pragmatist moral epistemology that provides us with a clear justification of why it is important to take best standards, norms, and physician judgment seriously and a clear (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4. Pragmatism.Cheryl J. Misak - 2001 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 37 (3):416-427.
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  5. Scientific Realism, Anti-Realism, and Empiricism.Cheryl J. Misak - 2006 - In John R. Shook & Joseph Margolis (eds.), A Companion to Pragmatism. Blackwell.
    Export citation  
    My bibliography