5 found
Order:
  1.  83
    Public Stem Cell Banks: Considerations of Justice in Stem Cell Research and Therapy.Ruth R. Faden, Liza Dawson, Alison S. Bateman-House, Dawn Mueller Agnew, Hilary Bok, Dan W. Brock, Aravinda Chakravarti, Xiao-Jiang Gao, Mark Greene, John A. Hansen, Patricia A. King, Stephen J. O'Brien, David H. Sachs, Kathryn E. Schill, Andrew Siegel, Davor Solter, Sonia M. Suter, Catherine M. Verfaillie, LeRoy B. Walters & John D. Gearhart - 2003 - Hastings Center Report 33 (6):13-27.
    If stem cell-based therapies are developed, we will likely confront a difficult problem of justice: for biological reasons alone, the new therapies might benefit only a limited range of patients. In fact, they might benefit primarily white Americans, thereby exacerbating long-standing differences in health and health care.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  2.  10
    The First Amendment and Physician Speech in Reproductive Decision Making.Sonia M. Suter - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (1):22-34.
    Courts are divided as to whether abortion informed consent mandates violate the First Amendment. This article argues that given the doctor's and patient's unique expertise, the patient's strong interests in autonomous decision making, and the fact that these laws regulate speech, rather than conduct, heighted or strict scrutiny should apply to such mandates.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3.  29
    Value Neutrality and Nondirectiveness: Comments on "Future Directions in Genetic Counseling".Sonia M. Suter - 1998 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (2):161-163.
    : Common wisdom in genetic counseling, which is supported by Biesecker, holds that counselors should strive not to influence their clients' decision making. Such a presumption of nondirectiveness is challenged in this commentary.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  4. Reproductive Technologies and Free Speech.Sonia M. Suter - 2021 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 49 (4):514-530.
    The Supreme Court and lower courts have not articulated a clear or consistent framework for First Amendment analysis of speech restrictions in health care and with respect to abortion. After offering a coherent doctrine for analysis of speech restrictions in the doctor-patient relationship, this piece demonstrates how potential legislation restricting patient access to information from reproductive testing intended to limit “undesirable” reproductive choices would violate the First Amendment.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  14
    Review of Robert Klitzman, Am I My Genes? Confronting Fate and Family Secrets in the Age of Genetic Testing 1. [REVIEW]Sonia M. Suter - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):52-53.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 10, Page 52-53, October 2012.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark