Detecting Epistemic Vice in Higher Education Policy: Epistemic Insensibility in the Seven Solutions and the REF

Journal of Philosophy of Education 47 (2):263-280 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article argues that the Seven Solutions in the US, and the Research Excellence Framework in the UK, manifest the vice of epistemic insensibility. Section I provides an overview of Aristotle's analysis of moral vice in people. Section II applies Aristotle's analysis to epistemic vice, developing an account of epistemic insensibility. In so doing, it contributes a new epistemic vice to the field of virtue epistemology. Section III argues that the (US) Seven Breakthrough Solutions and, to a lesser extent, the (UK) Research Excellence Framework manifest two key features of the vice of epistemic insensibility. First, they promote a failure to desire, consume, and enjoy some knowledge that it is appropriate to desire, consume, and enjoy. Second, they do so because they wrongly assume that such knowledge is not epistemically good. The Solutions wrongly assume that any research that lacks ‘impact’, in the form of funding, thereby lacks epistemic value. The REF wrongly assumes of otherwise comparable bodies of research, that the research that lacks ‘impact’ has less epistemic value

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epistemic Badness.Anthony T. Flood - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Research 33:253-262.
Epistemic self-indulgence.Heather Battaly - 2010 - Metaphilosophy 41 (1-2):214-234.
Epistemic malevolence.Jason Baehr - 2010 - Metaphilosophy 41 (1-2):189-213.
Epistemic Desiderata and Epistemic Pluralism.Rik Peels - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Research 35:193-207.
Other–regarding epistemic virtues.Jason Kawall - 2002 - Ratio 15 (3):257–275.
Epistemic responsibility.J. Angelo Corlett - 2008 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (2):179 – 200.
Moore’s Paradox and Epistemic Justification.Robert Hambourger - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:1-12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-05-17

Downloads
97 (#177,342)

6 months
11 (#231,933)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Heather Battaly
University of Connecticut

Citations of this work

Epistemic Corruption and Education.Ian James Kidd - 2019 - Episteme 16 (2):220-235.
Charging Others With Epistemic Vice.Ian James Kidd - 2016 - The Monist 99 (3):181-197.
The (virtue) epistemology of political ignorance.Cameron Boult - 2021 - American Philosophical Quarterly 58 (3):217-232.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Complete Works: The Rev. Oxford Translation.Jonathan Barnes (ed.) - 1984 - Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Pragmatism.William James - 1922 - New York [etc.]: Longmans, Green and co.. Edited by William James & Doris Olin.

View all 19 references / Add more references