David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 151 (3):523-536 (2006)
Suppose P is the conjunction of all truths statable in the austere vocabulary of an ideal physics. Then phsicalists are likely to accept that any truths not included in P are different ways of talking about the reality specified by P. This ‘redescription thesis’ can be made clearer by means of the ‘strict implication thesis’, according to which inconsistency or incoherence are involved in denying the implication from P to interesting truths not included in it, such as truths about phenomenal consciousness. Commitment to the strict implication thesis cannot be escaped by appeal to a posteriori necessary identities or entailments. A minimal physicalism formulated in terms of strict implication is preferable to one based on a priori entailment
|Keywords||CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS QUALIA|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jaegwon Kim (1998). Mind in a Physical World: An Essay on the Mind-Body Problem and Mental Causation. MIT Press.
David J. Chalmers (1996). The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press.
John W. Bickle (2008). Psychoneural Reduction: The New Wave. A Bradford Book.
Frank Jackson (1982). Epiphenomenal Qualia. Philosophical Quarterly 32 (April):127-136.
David J. Chalmers & Frank Jackson (2001). Conceptual Analysis and Reductive Explanation. Philosophical Review 110 (3):315-61.
Citations of this work BETA
Tom Polger (2013). Physicalism and Moorean Supervenience. Analytic Philosophy 54 (1):72-92.
Similar books and articles
Fabrice Correia (2001). Priorean Strict Implication, Q and Related Systems. Studia Logica 69 (3):411-427.
Jürgen Schröder (2006). Physicalism and Strict Implication. Synthese 151 (3):537 - 545.
Robert Kirk (1996). Strict Implication, Supervenience, and Physicalism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (2):244-57.
Robert Kirk (2001). Nonreductive Physicalism and Strict Implication. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (4):544-552.
Robert Kirk (1982). Physicalism, Identity, and Strict Implication. Ratio 24 (December):131-41.
Claudio Cerrato (1994). Natural Deduction Based Upon Strict Implication for Normal Modal Logics. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35 (4):471-495.
Robert Kirk (1996). How Physicalists Can Avoid Reductionism. Synthese 108 (2):157-70.
Jan Heylen & Leon Horsten (2006). Strict Conditionals: A Negative Result. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):536–549.
Robert Kirk (1996). Physicalism Lives. Ratio 9 (1):85-89.
Jurgen Schroder (2006). Physicalism and Strict Implication. Synthese 151 (3):537-545.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads57 ( #59,957 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #147,227 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?