Being a physicalist: How and (more importantly) why
Philosophical Studies 74 (2):221-241 (1994)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Epistemology Knowledge Language Physicalism Science Unity | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesScott Sturgeon (1998). Physicalism and Overdetermination. Mind 107 (426):411-432.
Jeffrey E. Foss (1988). The Percept and Vector Function Theories of the Brain. Philosophy of Science 55 (December):511-537.
Andrew Melnyk (2008). Can Physicalism Be Non-Reductive? Philosophy Compass 3 (6):1281-1296.
Benedikt Paul Göcke (2009). What is Physicalism? Ratio 22 (3):291-307.
William F. Vallicella (1998). Could a Classical Theist Be a Physicalist? Faith and Philosophy 15 (2):160-180.
D. Gene Witmer (2006). How to Be a (Sort of) A Priori Physicalist. Philosophical Studies 131 (1):185-225.
Jeffrey Stephen Poland (1994). Physicalism, the Philosophical Foundations. Oxford University Press.
Lewis S. Feuer (1949). Mechanism, Physicalism, and the Unity of Science. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 9 (June):627-643.
Andrew Melnyk (2003). A Physicalist Manifesto: Thoroughly Modern Materialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads38 ( #30,942 of 549,131 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,303 of 549,131 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
