David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Topoi 7 (March):57-63 (1988)
Beginning with Descartes' caution not “imprudently” to “take some other object in place of myself”, I consider first the problems of self-identification confronted by various amnesiacs , both ordinary and Cartesian. Noting that cogitationes as such do not individuate, I proceed to examine conclusions drawn from certain sorts of “body-switching” thought experiments. This, in turn, gives rise to a general critique of “psychological connectedness” or “unity of consciousness” as a candidate criterion of personal identity. I conclude that our ability to apply any notion of personal identity is parasitic upon the existence of a conceptual apparatus for individuating, identifying, and reidentifying objects. Finally, I argue that, if ‘person’ is a proper sortal predicate to begin with, Descartes' res cogitans cannot be understood as a species of the genus res , distinct from res extensa and only problematically in “interaction” with it. Cartesian dualism is a multiply untenable doctrine
|Keywords||Dualism Metaphysics Philosophical Psychology Self-identity Descartes|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Alexandra Ronco, Minds, Brains, and Animals, Oh My! An Examination of Parfitian Personal Identity Through Cartesian Dualism.
Cecilia Wee & Michael Pelczar (2008). Descartes' Dualism and Contemporary Dualism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (1):145-160.
Michael Pelczar (2008). Descartes' Dualism and Contemporary Dualism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (1):145-160.
J. R. Smythies & John Beloff (eds.) (1989). The Case for Dualism. University of Virginia Press.
Charles Taliaferro (1986). Dualism and the Problem of Individuation. Religious Studies 22 (2):263 - 276.
John Hawthorne (2007). Cartesian Dualism. In Peter van Inwagen & D. Zimmerman (eds.), Persons Human and Divine. Oxford University Press
Keith David Yandell (1997). The Human as Mind-Body Union: An Account and Defense of Descartes's Interactionist Dualism. Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
William G. Lycan (2013). Is Property Dualism Better Off Than Substance Dualism? Philosophical Studies 164 (2):533-542.
Grant Duncan (2000). Mind-Body Dualism and the Biopsychosocial Model of Pain: What Did Descartes Really Say? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (4):485 – 513.
Gordon P. Baker (2002). Decartes' Dualism. Routledge.
Marleen Rozemond (1995). Descartes's Case for Dualism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 33 (1):29-63.
James van Cleve (1983). Conceivability and the Cartesian Argument for Dualism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64 (January):35-45.
Marleen Rozemond (2002). Descartes's Dualism. Harvard University Press.
Charles Champe Taliaferro (1984). Cartesian Dualism. Dissertation, Brown University
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads66 ( #54,853 of 1,777,948 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #205,717 of 1,777,948 )
How can I increase my downloads?