7 found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Louis Mancha (Ashland University)
  1.  11
    Louis A. Mancha Jr (2012). Aquinas, Suarez, and Malebranche on Instrumental Causation and Premotion. International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (3):335-353.
    In the analysis of Aquinas, instrumental causation is central to his doctrine of providence, yet their connection is not widely understood. On the one hand, early modern thinkers like Nicolas Malebranche claim that any notion of instrumental causation is unintelligible as a mode of divine operation. Alternatively, certain Thomists commit Aquinas to the doctrine of premotion, which partially resolves the problem of instrumental causation, but only at the cost of eliminating the causal freedom of creatures. In this paper I address (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  11
    Louis A. Mancha Jr (2005). A Counterfactual Analysis in Defense of Aquinas's Inference of Omnipotence From Creation Ex Nihilo. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:145-155.
    There is a traditional view, maintained by Aquinas and others, which holds that there is a mutual entailment between the power to Create Ex Nihilo and the property of omnipotence. In his Metaphysical Disputations, however, Suarez attacks the traditional view by pointing out a seriousflaw in Aquinas’s argument. Suarez claims that there is no reason in principle why God cannot miraculously bestow CEN-power to creatures––albeit in a limitedform––even on the assumption that God cannot make creatures omnipotent. In this paper the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  19
    Louis A. Mancha Jr (2003). Defending God's Strong Conservation. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:145-157.
    Defenders of the strong view of divine conservation hold that nothing that God creates is capable of sustaining its own existence from one moment to the next without His immediate and continual influence. Assuming a traditional view about efficient causality, I demonstrate that simply in virtue of being committedto creation ex nihilo, the theist is thereby committed to this strong view of conservation.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  4
    J. L. Mancha (1997). Levi Ben Gerson's Astronomical Work: Chronology and Christian Context. Science in Context 10 (3).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Jose Luis Mancha (1996). An Almanac for Trebizond for the Year 1336Raymond Mercier. Isis 87 (3):540-541.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  1
    Louis A. Mancha (2003). Concurrentism: A Philosophical Explanation. Dissertation, Purdue University
    The main focus of this dissertation is the late medieval doctrine of Concurrentism. Concurrentists hold that God is immediately, causally involved in every event in nature, and yet so are creatures: For any natural effect to obtain, both God and creature must make a genuine causal contribution to the effect. Yet the presence of God's immanent activity in nature is claimed to not overdetermine or render otiose the real and necessary causal input of creatures. I develop and defend this view (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Manuel Mancha (2003). La Delegación del CSIC en Andalucía como experiencia. Arbor 176 (695-696):167-177.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography