11 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Michael Kalichman [9]Michael W. Kalichman [2]
  1. Michael Kalichman, Monica Sweet & Dena Plemmons (forthcoming). Standards of Scientific Conduct: Are There Any? Science and Engineering Ethics:1-12.
    The practice of research is full of ethical challenges, many of which might be addressed through the teaching of responsible conduct of research (RCR). Although such training is increasingly required, there is no clear consensus about either the goals or content of an RCR curriculum. The present study was designed to assess community standards in three domains of research practice: authorship, collaboration, and data management. A survey, developed through advice from content matter experts, focus groups, and interviews, was distributed in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Mary Devereaux & Michael Kalichman (2013). ESCRO Committees—Not Dead Yet. American Journal of Bioethics 13 (1):59-60.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Michael Kalichman, Dena Plemmons & Stephanie J. Bird (2012). Editors' Overview: Neuroethics: Many Voices and Many Stories. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (3):423-432.
    Advances in neuroscience continue to enhance understanding of the brain and provide new tools to take advantage of that understanding. These changes are poised to profoundly alter society. Given that the impact will be felt not only by neuroscientists, but by diverse members of society, it is imperative that conversations engage all stakeholders. Doing so will allow for the sharing of diverse views and perspectives to understand and frame the science, better educate and prepare the public for new developments, and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Tricia Bertram Gallant & Michael Kalichman (2011). Academic Ethics : A Systems Approach to Understanding Misconduct and Empowering Change in the Academy. In Tricia Bertram Gallant (ed.), Creating the Ethical Academy: A Systems Approach to Understanding Misconduct and Empowering Change in Higher Education. Routledge.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Michael Kalichman (2011). Overview: Underserved Areas of Education in the Responsible Conduct of Research: Authorship. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2):335-339.
    In February of 2007, the Responsible Conduct of Research Education Committee of the Association for Practical and Professional Ethics convened a mini-conference at the Association’s annual meeting. The purpose of the mini-conference was to examine underserved areas of education in research ethics. The mini-conference consisted of panel discussions for two topics: authorship and social responsibility. Representatives from diverse academic disciplines were invited to participate in each of the two panels. This Special Section of Science and Engineering Ethics consists of the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Michael Kalichman (2009). Evidence-Based Research Ethics. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6):85-87.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Sean T. Powell, Matthew A. Allison & Michael W. Kalichman (2007). Effectiveness of a Responsible Conduct of Research Course: A Preliminary Study. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (2):249-264.
    Training in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) is required for many research trainees nationwide, but little is known about its effectiveness. For a preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of a short-term course in RCR, medical students participating in an NIH-funded summer research program at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) were surveyed using an instrument developed through focus group discussions. In the summer of 2003, surveys were administered before and after a short-term RCR course, as well as to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Dena K. Plemmons, Suzanne A. Brody & Michael W. Kalichman (2006). Student Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Education in the Responsible Conduct of Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (3):571-582.
    Responsible conduct of research (RCR) courses are widely taught, but little is known about the purposes or effectiveness of such courses. As one way to assess the purposes of these courses, students were surveyed about their perspectives after recent completion of one of eleven different research ethics courses at ten different institutions. Participants (undergraduate and graduate students, post-doctoral fellows and faculty, staff and researchers) enrolled in RCR courses in spring and fall of 2003 received a voluntary, anonymous survey from their (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Michael Kalichman (2005). Use and Abuse of the Internet for Teaching Research Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):341-345.
  10. Michael Kalichman (2002). Ethical Decision-Making in Research: Identifying All Competing Interests. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):215-218.
    Ethical dilemmas are the result of conflicts between potential benefits or harms for two or more competing interests. Therefore, ethical decision-making implies a responsibility to identify those interests, harms, and benefits. For this purpose, researchers have responsibilities to the research, the subjects of research, other researchers, the institution, society, the environment, and self.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Michael Kalichman & Sarah Brown (1998). Effects of Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research: A Survey of Graduate Students in Experimental Sciences. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (4):487-498.
    In recent years, programs for training in research ethics have become widespread, but very little has been done to assess the effectiveness of this training. Because initial studies have failed to demonstrate a positive impact of research ethics training, this project defined two new outcome variables to be tested in a sample of graduate students at the University of California, San Diego. Trainees were surveyed to assess the role of ethics training in altering their perceptions about their own standards, or (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation