In Kathryn J. Norlock (ed.), The Moral Psychology of Forgiveness. London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 117-134 (2017)
AbstractForgiveness and reconciliation are central to moral life; after all, everyone will be wronged by others and will then face the dual decisions of whether to forgive and whether to reconcile. It is therefore important that we have a clear analysis of each, as well as a thoroughly articulated understanding of how they relate to and differ from each other. Forgiveness has received considerably more attention in the Western philosophical literature than has reconciliation. In this paper I aim to give it the attention it deserves and develop an account of interpersonal reconciliation. On my view reconciliation is fundamentally bilateral (whereas forgiveness is fundamentally unilateral). It entails transparency and agreement between the wrongdoer and the victim as to the nature of a past wrong or set of wrongs. And, it requires that moral repair be made between the two parties (which entails that both parties bear proper attitudes towards each other). In making my case I contrast reconciliation with toleration and collaboration, in order to demonstrate that reconciliation also entails forgiveness (though forgiveness does not entail reconciliation).
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 2003 - In Gary Watson (ed.), Free Will. Oxford University Press.
Moral Repair: Reconstructing Moral Relations After Wrongdoing.Margaret Urban Walker - 2006 - Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work
Against Elective Forgiveness.Per-Erik Milam - 2018 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (3):569-584.
Why Reconciliation Requires Punishment but Not Forgiveness.Thaddeus Metz - 2022 - In Krisanna Scheiter & Paula Satne (eds.), Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment. Springer. pp. 265-281.
Forgiveness and Moral Repair.Kathryn J. Norlock - 2022 - In Manuel Vargas & John M. Doris (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Moral Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Forgiveness and the Multiple Functions of Anger.Antony G. Aumann & Zac Cogley - 2019 - Journal of Philosophy of Emotion 1 (1):44-71.
Similar books and articles
Reply to Griswold, Forgiveness: A Philosophical Exploration. [REVIEW]Michele Moody-Adams - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (3):429-437.
Unilateral Forgiveness and the Task of Reconciliation.Jeremy Watkins - 2015 - Res Publica 21 (1):19-42.
The Moral Psychology of Forgiveness.Kathryn J. Norlock (ed.) - 2017 - Rowman & Littlefield International.
Forgiveness and Reconciliation in Transitional Justice Practices.Neelke Doorn - 2008 - Ethical Perspectives 15 (3):381-398.
Forgiveness and Reconciliation in the Workplace: A Multi-Level Perspective and Research Agenda. [REVIEW]Michael E. Palanski - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 109 (3):275-287.
The Distinctive Character of Buddhist Forgiveness and Reconciliation.S. J. Noel Sheth - 2017 - Annals of the University of Bucharest - Philosophy Series 66 (1).
Mourning and Forgiveness as Sites of Reconciliation Pedagogies.Michalinos Zembylas - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (3):257-265.
Melting the Icepacks of Enmity: Forgiveness and Reconciliation in Northern Ireland.Nigel Biggar - 2011 - Studies in Christian Ethics 24 (2):199-209.
Reconciling With Harm: An Alternative To Forgiveness And Revenge.Nancy Stanlick - 2010 - Florida Philosophical Review 10 (1):88-111.
On Taking Back Forgiveness.Geoffrey Scarre - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (4):931-944.
Forgiveness and Reconciliation in Hobbes’s Natural Law Theory.Maximilian Jaede - 2017 - History of European Ideas (8):1-12.
The Personal and the Political: Forgiveness and Reconciliation in Restorative Justice.Ari Kohen - 2009 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12 (3):399-423.