Foundations of Chemistry 17 (1):49-65 (2015)
Authors | |
Abstract |
Scientific practices have been changed by the increasing use of computer simulations. A central question for philosophers is how to characterize computer simulations. In this paper, we address this question by analyzing simulations in biochemistry. We propose that simulations have been used in biochemistry long before computers arrived. Simulation can be described as a surrogate relationship between models. Moreover, a simulative aspect is implicit in the classical dichotomy between in vivo–in vitro conditions. Based on a discussion about how to characterize a simulative aspect in this dichotomy, we will argue that an adequate understanding of computer simulations in biochemistry requires a previous understanding of simulations in experimental contexts
|
Keywords | Computer simulations in biochemistry Experiments In vivo–in vitro dichotomy |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s10698-015-9215-2 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method.Paul Humphreys - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Does Matter Really Matter? Computer Simulations, Experiments, and Materiality.Wendy S. Parker - 2009 - Synthese 169 (3):483-496.
Languages of Art. An Approach to a Theory of Symbols.Nelson Goodman - 1970 - Critica 4 (11/12):164-171.
Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols.B. C. O'Neill - 1971 - Philosophical Quarterly 21 (85):361.
View all 14 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
How Can Computer Simulations Produce New Knowledge?Claus Beisbart - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (3):395-434.
Computer Simulations as Experiments.Anouk Barberousse, Sara Franceschelli & Cyrille Imbert - 2009 - Synthese 169 (3):557 - 574.
Are We Sims? How Computer Simulations Represent and What This Means for the Simulation Argument.Claus Beisbart - 2014 - The Monist 97 (3):399-417.
Experiments, Simulations, and Epistemic Privilege.Emily C. Parke - 2014 - Philosophy of Science 81 (4):516-536.
The Educational Use of Computer Based Science Simulations: Some Lessons From the Philosophy of Science.William J. McKinney - 1997 - Science & Education 6 (6):591-603.
Why Monte Carlo Simulations Are Inferences and Not Experiments.Claus Beisbart & John D. Norton - 2012 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26 (4):403-422.
How Digital Computer Simulations Explain Real‐World Processes.Ulrich Krohs - 2008 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (3):277 – 292.
When Simulations Conflict: Problems with the External Validation of Computer Simulations.Archie Fields - unknown
Introduction: Computer Simulations in Social Epistemology.Igor Douven - 2009 - Episteme 6 (2):107-109.
Philosophy and Biochemistry: Research at the Interface Between Chemistry and Biology. [REVIEW]Claus Jacob - 2002 - Foundations of Chemistry 4 (2):97-125.
About the Warrants of Computer-Based Empirical Knowledge.Anouk Barberousse & Marion Vorms - 2014 - Synthese 191 (15):3595-3620.
Computer Simulations, Idealizations and Approximations.Ronald Laymon - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:519 - 534.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2015-03-21
Total views
16 ( #665,485 of 2,506,134 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,134 )
2015-03-21
Total views
16 ( #665,485 of 2,506,134 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,134 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads