Neuroethics 6 (3):541-578 (2013)

Pim Haselager
Radboud University Nijmegen
Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) research and (future) applications raise important ethical issues that need to be addressed to promote societal acceptance and adequate policies. Here we report on a survey we conducted among 145 BCI researchers at the 4th International BCI conference, which took place in May–June 2010 in Asilomar, California. We assessed respondents’ opinions about a number of topics. First, we investigated preferences for terminology and definitions relating to BCIs. Second, we assessed respondents’ expectations on the marketability of different BCI applications (BCIs for healthy people, BCIs for assistive technology, BCIs-controlled neuroprostheses and BCIs as therapy tools). Third, we investigated opinions about ethical issues related to BCI research for the development of assistive technology: informed consent process with locked-in patients, risk-benefit analyses, team responsibility, consequences of BCI on patients’ and families’ lives, liability and personal identity and interaction with the media. Finally, we asked respondents which issues are urgent in BCI research
Keywords Brain-computer interfaces  Brain-machine interfaces  Neuroethics  Neuroimaging  Locked-in syndrome
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12152-011-9132-6
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,486
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
84 ( #121,037 of 2,421,440 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #68,152 of 2,421,440 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes