Theory and Decision 60 (4):403-438 (2006)

Abstract
The notion of ecological rationality implies that the accuracy of a decision strategy depends on features of the information environment in which it is tested. We demonstrate that the performance of a group may be strongly affected by the decision strategies used by its individual members and specify how this effect is moderated by environmental features. Specifically, in a set of simulation studies, we systematically compared four decision strategies used by the individual group members: two linear, compensatory decision strategies and two simple, noncompensatory heuristics. Individual decisions were aggregated by using a majority rule. To assess the ecological rationality of the strategies, we varied the distribution of cue validities, the quantity, and the quality of shared information. Group performance strongly depended on the distribution of cue validities. When validities were linearly distributed, groups using a compensatory strategy achieved the highest accuracy. Conversely, when cue validities followed a J-shaped distribution, groups using a simple lexicographic heuristic performed best. While these effects were robust across different quantities of shared information, the quality of shared information exerted stronger effects on group performance. Consequences for prescriptive theories on group decision making are discussed.
Keywords compensatory and noncompensatory decision strategies  group decision making  group performance  simple heuristics
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11238-005-4750-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,740
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Elimination by Aspects: A Theory of Choice.Amos Tversky - 1972 - Psychological Review 79 (4):281-299.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

How Smart Can Simple Heuristics Be?Nick Chater - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):745-746.
Smart People Who Make Simple Heuristics Work.Annika Wallin & Peter Gärdenfors - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):765-765.
From Simon 's Scissors for Rationality to Abc's Adaptive Toolbox.X. T. Wang - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):765-766.
Heuristics in Technoscientific Thinking.Michael E. Gorman - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):752-752.
Cooperation and Trust in Group Context.Raimo Tuomela - 2005 - Mind and Society 4 (1):49-84.
What is an Ecologically Rational Heuristic?Stephen E. Newstead - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):759-760.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-31

Total views
48 ( #203,711 of 2,386,866 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #550,981 of 2,386,866 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes