In Akira Akabayashi (ed.), The Future of Bioethics: International Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2014)

Authors
Julian Savulescu
Oxford University
Thomas Douglas
Oxford University
Ingmar Persson
Oxford University
Abstract
The authors respond to a wide range of objections defending our argument that some forms of behaviour modification utilising advances in the cognitive sciences are desirable and need not necessarily undermine autonomy or freedom.
Keywords autonomy  freedom  behavioural modification  ethics  cognitive sciences  coercion
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Moral Enhancement.Thomas Douglas - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (3):228-245.
The Moral Problem.Stephen Darwall - 1996 - Philosophical Quarterly 46 (185):508-515.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Can Self-Validating Neuroenhancement Be Autonomous?Jukka Varelius - 2020 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 23 (1):51-59.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Response to the Commentaries.Julian Savulescu & Donna Dickenson - 1998 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 5 (3):263-266.
Local Pragmatics in a Gricean Framework, Revisited: Response to Three Commentaries.Mandy Simons - 2017 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 60 (5):539-568.
Humans, Fruit Flies, and Automatons.Evan Charney - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):381-410.
Response to Commentators on Waking, Dreaming, Being.Evan Thompson - 2016 - Philosophy East and West 66 (3):982-1000.
Ashley Revisited: A Response to the Peer Commentaries.Douglas Diekema & Norman Fost - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (1):4-6.
Response to Commentaries [by Kitcher and Hesse].Thomas S. Kuhn - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:712 - 716.
In Reply [Reply to Commentaries on "How to Solve the Mind-Body Problem"].Nicholas Humphrey - 2000 - Humphrey, Nicholas (2000) in Reply [Reply to Commentaries on "How to Solve the Mind-Body Problem"]. [Journal (Paginated)] 7 (4):98-112.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-03-12

Total views
98 ( #113,045 of 2,461,834 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #36,500 of 2,461,834 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes