David Hume on Miracles, Evidence, and Probability

Lanham: Lexington Books (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hume says we never have grounds to believe in miracles. He’s right, but many commentators misunderstand his theory of probability and therefore his argument. This book shows that Humean probability descends from Roman law, and once properly contextualized historically and philosophically, Hume’s argument survives the criticisms leveled against it.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

David Hume and the probability of miracles.George I. Mavrodes - 1998 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43 (3):167-182.
Hume and Religious Miracles.Gregory L. Bock - 2011 - Philosophia Christi 13 (1):165-168.
Historical insights on miracles: Babbage, Hume, Aquinas. [REVIEW]John King-Farlow - 1982 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (4):209 - 218.
A Defense of Hume on Miracles. [REVIEW]Richard Otte - 2005 - Hume Studies 31 (1):165-168.
Schlesinger and Miracles.Richard Otte - 1993 - Faith and Philosophy 10 (1):93-98.
Hume on miracles: Interpretation and criticism.James E. Taylor - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (4):611–624.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-07

Downloads
95 (#58,635)

6 months
17 (#859,272)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Lee Vanderburgh
California State University, San Bernardino

Citations of this work

Miracles.Timothy McGrew - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Miracles.Michael Levine - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references