11 found
Order:
  1.  8
    Tadeusz Bilikiewicz’s Background in the Debate with Ludwik Fleck.Artur Koterski - 2016 - Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science 1:31.
    One of the factors that adversely influenced the worldwide reception of Fleck was the rather narrow critical interest that his ideas had aroused in Poland. Apart from a few reviews of his book, only two polemics were published before WWII, and these likewise fell into oblivion. The philosophical views of one of those polemists, Tadeusz Bilikiewicz, shared the same fate. Since an acquaintance with Bilikiewicz’s background would seem to be a necessary condition for a understanding of his controversy with Fleck, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  13
    Quine’s Two Dogmas as a Criticism of Logical Empiricism.Artur Koterski - 2015 - Philosophia Scientae 19:127-142.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  7
    ""Quine's" Two Dogmas" as a Criticism of Logical Empiricism.Artur Koterski - 2012 - Filozofia Nauki 20 (1):45 - +.
    Dans les « Deux dogmes», Quine voulait démontrer que le positivisme logique n’était possible qu’en raison d’hypothèses injustifiées. L’intention de Quine était de montrer qu’il n’est possible de sauver l’empirisme que si l’on accepte une autre approche, holistique. Toutefois, l’article de Quine était anachronique dès le moment de sa publication. Le but de cet article est double. Tout d’abord, on esquissera l’argument de Quine et on le confrontera aux positions de Carnap et Dubislav. On montrera que la critique de Quine (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  6
    The Rise and Fall of Falsificationism in the Light of Neurath's Criticism1.Artur Koterski - 2011 - In Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao Gonzalo, Thomas Uebel, Stephan Hartmann & Marcel Weber (eds.), Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation. Springer. pp. 487--498.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  4
    Henryk Mehlberg-The Reach of Science.Artur Koterski - 2001 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 74:121-128.
  6. „Dwa dogmaty” Quine'a jako krytyka logicznego empiryzmu.Artur Koterski - 2012 - Filozofia Nauki 20 (1).
    ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’ has quickly become a classic of analytical philosophy and has invoked the since lasting discussion about possibility of analytic/synthetic distinction. It has been also considered a nail to the coffin of logical positivism. Accordingly, Quine tried to show that logical positivism was possible solely due to assumptions taken without justification in terms of standards preached by neopositivism itself. Quine aimed to point out that since they functioned as dogmas, the rescuing of empiricism was possible only if (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. Demarkacja domowym sposobem.Artur Koterski - 2004 - Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 51 (3):21-26.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Jak być krytycznym racjonalistą.Artur Koterski - 2003 - Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 48 (4):37-47.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. Popper i Koło Wiedeńskie.Artur Koterski - 1998 - Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 25 (1):47-72.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Poznański and Wundheiler’s ‘The Concept of Truth in Physics’: The Lvov-Warsaw School Contribution to Encyclopedism.Thomas Uebel & Artur Koterski - 2017 - In Jan Woleński, Friedrich Stadler & Anna Brożek (eds.), The Significance of the Lvov-Warsaw School in the European Culture. Springer Verlag.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Nauka, rasizm i postrasizm.Artur Koterski - 2015 - Filozofia Nauki 23 (2):123-140.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark