David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Zygon 40 (4):953-974 (2005)
. In this essay I point toward the difficulties inherent in ontological objectivity and seek to restore our truth claims to validity through a relational ontology and the dynamic of coimplication in signals and noise. Theological examination of art and science points toward similarities between art, religion, and science. All three have often focused upon a “metaphysics of presence,” the desire for absolute presence of the object . If we accept a relational ontology, however, we must accept that the revelation of presence is always simultaneously a concealment. This helps explain technoscientific achievement without recourse to a philosophically flawed objectivity. Twentieth‐century information theory shows the impossibility of a “pure signal.” By accepting that signal and noise are permanently interconnected, we begin to see how noise makes signal possible and even how noise becomes signal . Information theory thus underscores important similarities and leads toward new approaches in aesthetics, Christian theology, and scientific research. By comparing art, religion, and science, I argue that rejecting a metaphysics of presence without rejecting presence itself allows human beings to know the world. Although religion, science, and art often seek the absolute presence of their objects, they function better without.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Bruno Latour (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Harvard University Press.
Thomas S. Kuhn (1996/2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Martin Heidegger (1967). Being and Time. Oxford, Blackwell.
Bruno Latour (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
S. Ducheyne (2008). Towards an Ontology of Scientific Models. Metaphysica 9 (1):119-127.
Konstantin A. Barsht (2011). Religious Thought and Scientific Knowledge in the Artistic System of Dostoevsky. Russian Studies in Philosophy 50 (3):34-47.
William A. Christian (1969). Religious Valuations of Scientific Truths. American Philosophical Quarterly 6 (2):144 - 150.
Kristen Irwin (2011). Amyraut on Reason and Religious Belief. Modern Schoolman 88 (3-4):191-200.
Matthew S. Bedke (2012). Against Normative Naturalism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):111 - 129.
Seungbae Park (2012). Against Moral Truths. Cultura 9 (1):179-194.
Whalen W. Lai (1983). Once More on the Two Truths: What Does Chi-Tsang Mean by the Two Truths as 'Yüeh-Chiao'? Religious Studies 19 (4):505 - 521.
Matthew Ratcliffe (2003). Scientific Naturalism and the Neurology of Religious Experience. Religious Studies 39 (3):323-345.
Kathleen Stock (2005). On Davies' Argument From Relational Properties. Acta Analytica 20 (4):24-31.
Brian Skyrms (2010). The Flow of Information in Signaling Games. Philosophical Studies 147 (1):155 - 165.
Jacques-Alexandre Sepulchre & Alejandra Ventura (2013). Intrinsic Feedbacks in MAPK Signaling Cascades Lead to Bistability and Oscillations. Acta Biotheoretica 61 (1):59-78.
Trenton Merricks (2007). Truth and Ontology. Oxford University Press.
Jerry S. Clegg (1972). Some Artistic Uses of Truths and Lies. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 31 (1):43-47.
David W. Cain (1972). Artistic Contrivance and Religious Communication. Religious Studies 8 (1):29 - 43.
Mark Jago (2012). The Truthmaker Non-Maximalist's Dilemma. Mind 121 (484):903-918.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads3 ( #462,774 of 1,725,867 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,716 of 1,725,867 )
How can I increase my downloads?