Religious Belief and Freedom of Expression: Is Offensiveness Really the Issue?

Res Publica 17 (1):75-90 (2011)
An objection frequently brought against critical or satirical expressions, especially when these target religions, is that they are ‘offensive’. In this article, I indicate why the existence of diverse and conflicting beliefs gives people an incentive to formulate their complaints in the language of offence. But I also cast doubt on whether people, in saying they are offended really mean to present that as the foundation of their complaint and, if they do, whether their complaint should weigh with us. These doubts do not apply to everything we might find offensive; in particular, they do not apply to simple cases of ‘sensory offence’; but they do apply to ‘belief-based offence’. Relying on offence also implies, inequitably, that different faiths should be differently protected depending on their susceptibility to offence; and the faithful themselves should worry about the flimsiness of claims based on ‘bare knowledge’ offence. I propose a principle of respect for beliefs as a differently grounded and more plausible reason for curbing our treatment of others’ beliefs. However, that principle has a limited compass and is hemmed in by the claims of free expression. It is also less suited to dictating the content of law than to influencing our conduct within the law
Keywords Freedom of speech  Freedom of expression  Offence  Offensiveness  Respect  Respect for beliefs  Danish cartoons   Jerry Springer: the Opera
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-011-9144-4
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,865
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
H. L. A. Hart (1964). Law, Liberty, and Morality. Philosophical Review 73 (2):271-274.
Joel Feinberg (1987). Offense to Others. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48 (1):147-153.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
David Archard (2008). Disgust, Offensiveness and the Law. Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (4):314-321.
James Edwards (2011). Coming Clean About the Criminal Law. Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):315-332.
Robin Barrow (2009). Academic Freedom: Its Nature, Extent and Value. British Journal of Educational Studies 57 (2):178 - 190.
Gregory Mellema (2005). Moral Dilemmas and Offence. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (3):291 - 298.
Danny Frederick (2011). Pornography and Freedom. Kritike: An Online Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):84-95.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

35 ( #91,921 of 1,724,890 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #167,175 of 1,724,890 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.