Concepts without intuition lose the game: commentary on Montero and Evans (2011) [Book Review]

Abstract
In several papers, Hubert Dreyfus has used chess as a paradigmatic example of how experts act intuitively, rarely using deliberation when selecting actions, while individuals that are only competent rely on analytic and deliberative thought. By contrast, Montero and Evans (Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10:175–194, 2011 ) argue that intuitive aspects of chess are actually rational, in the sense that actions can be justified. In this paper, I show that both Dreyfus’s and Montero and Evans’s views are too extreme, and that expertise in chess, and presumably in other domains, depends on a combination of intuitive thinking and deliberative search, both mediated by perceptual processes. There is more to expertise than just rational thought. I further contend that both sides ignore emotions, which are important in acquiring and maintaining expertise. Finally, I argue that experimental data and first-person data, which are sometimes presented as irreconcilable in the phenomenology literature, actually lead to similar conclusions.
Keywords Action  Chess  Deliberation  Expertise  Hubert Dreyfus  Intuition  Skill
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11097-011-9246-7
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,829
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Mind and World.John McDowell - 1994 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
The Concept of Mind.Gilbert Ryle - 1949 - Hutchinson & Co.
The Return of the Myth of the Mental.Hubert L. Dreyfus - 2007 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (4):352 – 365.
What Myth?John Mcdowell - 2007 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (4):338 – 351.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Chess, Imagination, and Perceptual Understanding.Paul Coates - 2013 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 73:211-242.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
An Active Symbols Theory of Chess Intuition.Alexandre Linhares - 2005 - Minds and Machines 15 (2):131-181.
Moral Intuitions, Moral Expertise and Moral Reasoning.Albert W. Musschenga - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (4):597-613.
On the Philosophical Dimensions of Chess.Arto Siitonen - 1998 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 41 (4):455 – 475.
The Reviled Art.Stuart Rachels - 2008 - In Benjamin Hale (ed.), Philosophy Looks at Chess. Open Court Press.
Philosophy Looks at Chess.Benjamin Hale (ed.) - 2008 - Open Court Press.
Pre-Reflective Ethical Know-How.Nigel DeSouza - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):279-294.
The Faculty of Intuition.Steven D. Hales - 2012 - Analytic Philosophy 53 (2):180-207.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-11-16

Total downloads

28 ( #185,103 of 2,178,184 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #166,015 of 2,178,184 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums