- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Disruption, Diversity, and Global Biobanking
American Journal of Bioethics 19 (5):45-47 (2019)
Abstract
Volume 19, Issue 5, May 2019, Page 45-47.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Understanding (in) Consent for Governance.Michael A. Lensink, Sarah N. Boers, Karin R. Jongsma & Annelien L. Bredenoord - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (5):43-45.
Ethics of AI in Transplant Matching: Is It Better or Just More of the Same?Dov Greenbaum & Maya Sherman - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (11):45-47.
Germline Gene Editing and Genetic Enhancement: The Value of(Non-)Positional Goods.Robert Ranisch - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (7):45-47.
Nudges and Budges.Karoly Majtenyi & Matthew Ruble - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (5):72-74.
Are Corporations Nudging the Nudgers?Jonathan H. Marks - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (5):70-72.
What Is Adequate Understanding?Gopal Sreenivasan - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (5):38-40.
Informed Consent: A Matter of Aspiration Since 1966.Sarah Wieten, Jacob Blythe & David Magnus - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (5):3-5.
Reciprocity and the Quest for Meaningful Disclosure.Ma’N. H. Zawati & Bartha Maria Knoppers - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (5):36-38.
In Defense of Nudging When the Stakes Are High.Monica E. Lemmon & Peter A. Ubel - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (5):62-63.
Measuring Understanding and Respecting Trust in Biobank Consent.T. J. Kasperbauer & Peter H. Schwartz - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (5):29-31.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-05-09
Downloads
28 (#589,033)
6 months
7 (#491,177)
2019-05-09
Downloads
28 (#589,033)
6 months
7 (#491,177)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Broad Consent for Research With Biological Samples: Workshop Conclusions.Christine Grady, Lisa Eckstein, Ben Berkman, Dan Brock, Robert Cook-Deegan, Stephanie M. Fullerton, Hank Greely, Mats G. Hansson, Sara Hull, Scott Kim, Bernie Lo, Rebecca Pentz, Laura Rodriguez, Carol Weil, Benjamin S. Wilfond & David Wendler - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):34-42.
Exploring Understanding of “Understanding”: The Paradigm Case of Biobank Consent Comprehension.Laura M. Beskow & Kevin P. Weinfurt - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (5):6-18.
Ethics and Epistemology in Big Data Research.Wendy Lipworth, Paul H. Mason, Ian Kerridge & John P. A. Ioannidis - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (4):489-500.
Broad Consent Is Consent for Governance.Sarah N. Boers, Johannes J. M. van Delden & Annelien L. Bredenoord - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):53-55.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-dxklk uwo