Extending the Limits of Nature. Political Animals, Artefacts, and Social Institutions

Philosophical Readings 1 (12):35-44 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay discusses how medieval authors from the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries dealt with a philosophical problem that social institutions pose for the Aristotelian dichotomy between natural and artificial entities. It is argued that marriage, political community, and language provided a particular challenge for the conception that things which are designed by human beings are artefacts. Medieval philosophers based their arguments for the naturalness of social institutions on the anthropological view that human beings are political animals by nature, but this strategy required rethinking the borderline between nature and art. The limits of nature were extended, as social institutions were considered to be natural even though they are in many ways similar to artificial products.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Peter of John olivi on the psychology of animal action.Juhana Toivanen - 2011 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (4):413-438.
Aquinas, Thomas.James Dominic Rooney - 2022 - In Mortimer Sellers & Stephan Kirste (eds.), Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Springer.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-01

Downloads
312 (#68,276)

6 months
87 (#60,351)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Juhana Toivanen
University of Jyväskylä

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations