22 found
Order:
  1.  32
    False Hopes and Best Data: Consent to Research and the Therapeutic Misconception.Paul S. Appelbaum, Loren H. Roth, Charles W. Lidz, Paul Benson & William Winslade - 1987 - Hastings Center Report 17 (2):20-24.
  2.  1
    Therapeutic Misconception in Clinical Research: Frequency and Risk Factors.Paul S. Appelbaum, Charles W. Lidz & Thomas Grisso - 2004 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 26 (2):1.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   52 citations  
  3.  51
    Voluntariness of Consent to Research: A Conceptual Model.Paul S. Appelbaum, Charles W. Lidz & Robert Klitzman - 2009 - Hastings Center Report 39 (1):30-39.
    Voluntariness of consent to research has not been sufficiently explored through empirical research. The aims of this study were to develop a more comprehensive approach to assessing voluntariness and to generate preliminary data on the extent and correlates of limitations on voluntariness. We developed a questionnaire to evaluate subjects’ reported motivations and constraints on voluntariness. 88 subjects in five different areas of clinical research—substance abuse, cancer, HIV, interventional cardiology, and depression—were assessed. Subjects reported a variety of motivations for participation. Offers (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  4.  12
    Why Is Therapeutic Misconception So Prevalent?Charles W. Lidz, Karen Albert, Paul Appelbaum, Laura B. Dunn, Eve Overton & Ekaterina Pivovarova - 2015 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (2):231-241.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  5.  16
    Reliance Agreements and Single IRB Review of Multisite Research: Concerns of IRB Members and Staff.Charles W. Lidz, Ekaterina Pivovarova, Paul Appelbaum, Deborah F. Stiles, Alexandra Murray & Robert L. Klitzman - 2018 - Ajob Empirical Bioethics 9 (3):164-172.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  6.  25
    Re-Evaluating the Therapeutic Misconception: Response to Miller and Joffe.Paul S. Appelbaum & Charles W. Lidz - 2006 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (4):367-373.
    : Responding to the paper by Miller and Joffe, we review the development of the concept of therapeutic misconception (TM). Our concerns about TM's impact on informed consent do not derive from the belief that research subjects have poorer outcomes than persons receiving ordinary clinical care. Rather, we believe that subjects with TM cannot give an adequate informed consent to research participation, which harms their dignitary interests and their abilities to make meaningful decisions. Ironically, Miller and Joffe's approach ends up (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  7.  40
    The Silent Majority: Who Speaks at IRB Meetings.Philip J. Candilis, Charles W. Lidz, Paul S. Appelbaum, Robert M. Arnold, William P. Gardner, Suzanne Myers, Albert J. Grudzinskas Jr & Lorna J. Simon - 2012 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 34 (4):15-20.
    Institutional review boards are almost universally considered to be overworked and understaffed. They also require substantial commitments of time and resources from their members. Although some surveys report average IRB memberships of 15 people or more, federal regulations require only five. We present data on IRB meetings at eight of the top 25 academic medical centers in the United States funded by the National Institutes of Health. These data indicate substantial contributions from primary reviewers and chairs during protocol discussions but (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  8.  23
    Clinical Ethics Versus Clinical Research.Paul S. Appelbaum & Charles W. Lidz - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (4):53 – 55.
  9.  27
    Twenty-Five Years of Therapeutic Misconception.Paul S. Appelbaum & Charles W. Lidz - 2008 - Hastings Center Report 38 (2):5-6.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  10.  27
    What the ANPRM Missed: Additional Needs for IRB Reform.Charles W. Lidz & Suzanne Garverich - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (2):390-396.
    Institutional Review Boards are mandated to carry out the requirements of the Common Rule, and it is widely agreed that they are appropriate and necessary mechanisms to ensure the ethical conduct of human research. In this paper, we suggest that the changes proposed in ANPRM, although generally helpful, fail to take into consideration how IRBs actually review applications and therefore do not adequately address some of the problems that may be leading to ineffective human subject protection.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  11.  3
    What the ANPRM Missed: Additional Needs for IRB Reform.Charles W. Lidz & Suzanne Garverich - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (2):390-396.
    The federal Common Rule, which governs the conduct of research with human subjects, specifies the criteria and procedures by which Institutional Review Boards should review such research. Although there is wide agreement that IRBs, or Research Ethics Committees as they are called in most of the world, are essential to assuring that human subjects research meets common standards of ethics, IRBs have always come under considerable criticism. Some have critiqued IRBs for using important resources inefficiently, including the large amount of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  12.  5
    Correction and Clarification: Therapeutic Misconception in Clinical Research: Frequency and Risk Factors.Paul S. Appelbaum, Charles W. Lidz & Thomas Grisso - 2004 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 26 (5):18.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  13. When the Subjects Are Hospital Staff, Is It Ethical (Or Possible) to Get Informed Consent?Jeffrey L. Geller & Charles W. Lidz - 1987 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 9 (5):4.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  14. Familial Coercion to Participate in Genetic Family Studies: Is There Cause for IRB Intervention?Lisa S. Parker & Charles W. Lidz - 1994 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 16 (1/2):6.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  15.  10
    Reducing the Single IRB Burden: Streamlining Electronic IRB Systems.Alexandra Murray, Ekaterina Pivovarova, Robert Klitzman, Deborah F. Stiles, Paul Appelbaum & Charles W. Lidz - 2021 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 12 (1):33-40.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  44
    Issues of Ethics and Identity in Diagnosis of Late Life Depression.Lisa S. Parker & Charles W. Lidz - 2003 - Ethics and Behavior 13 (3):249-262.
    Depression is often diagnosed in patients nearing the end of their lives and medication or psychotherapy is prescribed. In many cases this is appropriate. However, it is widely agreed that a health care professional should treat sick persons so as to improve their condition as they define improvement. This raises questions about the contexts in which treatment of depression in late life is appropriate. This article reviews a problematic case concerning the appropriateness of treatment in light of the literature in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  17.  37
    An Exploratory Study of Therapeutic Misconception Among Incarcerated Clinical Trial Participants.Paul P. Christopher, Michael D. Stein, Sandra A. Springer, Josiah D. Rich, Jennifer E. Johnson & Charles W. Lidz - 2016 - Ajob Empirical Bioethics 7 (1):24-30.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Mrs. X and the Bone Marrow Transplant.Charles W. Lidz, Alan Meisel, Loren H. Roth, Arthur Caplan, David Zimmerman & C. L. - 1983 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 5 (4):6.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  24
    Paul S. Appelbaum is Elizabeth K.Susan Gilbert, Joyce A. Griffin, Gregory E. Kaebnick, Robert Klitzman & Charles W. Lidz - forthcoming - Hastings Center Report.
  20.  22
    Case Studies: Mrs. X and the Bone Marrow Transplant.Arthur Caplan, Charles W. Lidz, Alan Meisel, Loren H. Roth & David Zimmerman - 1983 - Hastings Center Report 13 (3):17.
  21.  6
    Introduction: Experiences of Psychiatric Hospitalization.Charles W. Lidz - 2011 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 1 (1):1-2.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  7
    17 Coercion and Undue Influence in Decisions to Participate in Psychiatric Research.Paul S. Appelbaum, Charles W. Lidz & Robert Klitzman - 2011 - In Thomas W. Kallert, Juan E. Mezzich & John Monahan (eds.), Coercive Treatment in Psychiatry: Clinical, Legal and Ethical Aspects. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 293.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark