Cet article présente les paradigmes de la cécité au changement. J'y identifie et évalue les interprétations perceptives et cognitives des déficits induits par des manipulations de l'attention, et critique le critère épistémique proposé par Dretske en faveur de la conception cognitive. Mon argument souligne l'influence de l'attention sur le contenu de l'expérience perceptive.

Partiendo de textos almohades o de textos posteriores que no han sido completamente desalmohadizados, este artículo quiere establecer que entre los almohades la palabra ṭalaba fue primero elegida por Ibn Tūmart para designar a sus compañeros, y fue después —a partir de ‛Abd al-Mu’min— utilizada para nombrar a los «legistas» oficiales del régimen, organizados en una sólida corporación, con grupos repartidos en todo el imperio: el grupo de los talibes-de-la-presencia al servicio del califa, y los grupos de los talibes locales, (...) talibes-de-los-almohades instalados en cada ciudad, al servicio del gobernador. Puesto que la época de los talibes es también la de Ibn-Rušd, ha parecido interesante examinar lo que revelan nuestros textos de la presencia de estos talaba en el entorno del filósofo qāḍī de Córdoba. (shrink)

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain (...) in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant. (shrink)

Volume 51, Issue 10, September 2019, Page 1061-1062.

This special issue of Studies in Philosophy and Education neither rejects, nor offers outright alternatives to the dominant contemporary model of education, but instead explores its margins and the possibilities they might offer for administrators, teachers and students within institutions and broader social contexts. The intention of the editors and contributors has been to tweak the focus from a critique of an oppressive system to a mapping of that system and the opportunities that exist within it–or on its margins–in spite (...) of itself. (shrink)